header-logo header-logo

29 July 2020
Issue: 7897 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail

Justice committee reports on court delays

MPs have criticised the lack of ‘basic data’ available to the judiciary on the extent of delays in the criminal courts

In a report published this week, ‘Coronavirus (Covid-19): the impact on courts’, the Justice Committee calls on ministers and HM Courts and Tribunals Service to ‘set out, with a timeline, how the provision of basic management information, of the type sought by the Lord Chief Justice, is to be achieved’.

During the inquiry, Lord Burnett, the Lord Chief Justice, told the committee: ‘What I have been trying to find out―we have not got there quite yet, I am afraid―is to identify with much more clarity how many trials we have, how many are trials with defendants awaiting trial in custody and how many are defendants awaiting trial on bail.’

Lord Burnett told the committee jury trial cases were accumulating at a rate of about 1,000 a month. 

Welcoming the report, Simon Davis, Law Society of England and Wales president (pictured) said: “After years of underfunding and cuts, there were already significant backlogs across the civil and criminal justice systems – which have only been exacerbated by the Covid-19 pandemic.

“There will be areas where remote hearings have been successful but for many cases – particularly those involving vulnerable parties – people must still be physically present for justice to be delivered. Before making remote hearings permanent in any area of law, there must be more comprehensive data collection and consultation with the legal profession to ensure this does not impact access to justice.

“We believe the government can build court capacity to clear the backlog by using unused public buildings – including court buildings which have been closed but have remained unsold – as Nightingale courts. Investing in legal aid for early advice and legal representation would help to nip problems in the bud before they escalate and ensure judicial time is used as efficiently as possible in cases which do go to court. 

“Before considering extending court hours, the Ministry of Justice and HM Courts and Tribunals Service must ensure that it is making maximum use of normal court hours and the existing court estate, quickly take up further building space and avoid any restrictions on judges sitting while there are court rooms (real, virtual or Nightingale) available.” 

Amanda Pinto QC, Chair of the Bar, said: "This report rightly acknowledges the far-reaching impact that Covid-19 has had on the operation of the justice system, particularly on jury trials. It is crucial that access to justice for the public is at the heart of any next steps, and that proposals to help clear the backlogs in all jurisdictions are viewed through this lens.

 "We share the committee's frustration over the availability and quality of data gathered by HMCTS on cases happening during the pandemic. We have asked for data for four months now, but been met with inexplicable reluctance. Without it, we cannot see the full picture. We know technology has played a huge part in how the justice system has adapted to the current crisis, but the right balance must be struck. Some cases and participants are not best served by remote hearings. When arranging hearings, this must be borne in mind in the interests of the public for whom being in court is often a life-altering event. We support further exploration of how witnesses and participants find the use of technology in their court cases. It is essential that investment in robust, high-quality technology and in the wider justice system, is addressed with the urgency it needs.”

 

Issue: 7897 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
back-to-top-scroll