header-logo header-logo

Justice & fairness

22 January 2016 / Ceri-Sian Williams , Steven Ford KC
Issue: 7683 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail
nlj_7683_williamsford

Ceri-Siân Williams & Steven Ford QC consider when strict liability will be imposed on an innocent defendant

In the recent case of NA v Nottinghamshire County Council [2015] EWCA Civ 1139, [2015] All ER (D) 126 (Nov) the Court of Appeal considered the limits of a local authority’s liability to a child abused by foster parents, and set important limits on the law of vicarious liability and non-delegable duties.

NA had been physically and sexually abused in two local authority foster placements. The authority had not been negligent: it had taken reasonable care in the selection of the foster parents and the monitoring of the placements. Nonetheless, NA claimed that the authority was liable to her for the abuse, either vicariously or because it could not delegate to the foster carers the duty of care it owed to her.

The Court of Appeal, rejecting both arguments, considered whether the recent expansion of the law of vicarious liability extends the doctrine to the relationship between a local authority and a foster parent, and whether the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll