header-logo header-logo

29 January 2009 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7354 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

The justice gap

The government should act to resolve iniquities at the heart of the inquest system, says Jon Robins

Justice must not only be done, it must be seen to be done—whether or not it raises awkward questions about, say, the Met’s response to the terrorist threat in our capital. Over the last week there has rightly been alarm in the press around the potential iniquity of inquests being run behind closed doors, away from families, jurors and members of the media. One hopes that the prospect of an inquest such as the one into the death of Jean Charles de Menezes is self-evidently appalling.

Following a question by the Tory MP Roger Gale, the Ministry of Justice provided a startling statistic last week revealing an iniquity that is already exists at the heart of the inquest system. It is an issue that the Coroners and Justice Bill misses: the lack of public funding available for many inquests.

Only 7% of the families of service personnel killed in Afghanistan or Iraq have received legal aid

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll