header-logo header-logo

The justice gap

29 January 2009 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7354 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

The government should act to resolve iniquities at the heart of the inquest system, says Jon Robins

Justice must not only be done, it must be seen to be done—whether or not it raises awkward questions about, say, the Met’s response to the terrorist threat in our capital. Over the last week there has rightly been alarm in the press around the potential iniquity of inquests being run behind closed doors, away from families, jurors and members of the media. One hopes that the prospect of an inquest such as the one into the death of Jean Charles de Menezes is self-evidently appalling.

Following a question by the Tory MP Roger Gale, the Ministry of Justice provided a startling statistic last week revealing an iniquity that is already exists at the heart of the inquest system. It is an issue that the Coroners and Justice Bill misses: the lack of public funding available for many inquests.

Only 7% of the families of service personnel killed in Afghanistan or Iraq have received legal aid

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll