header-logo header-logo

20 May 2022
Issue: 7979 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Justice inspectorates sound warning

The four HM Chief Inspectors of police, Criminal Prosecution Service, probation and prison services have issued a devastating warning on the ‘knock-on effect’ of the courts backlog

In a foreword to their joint report, published this week, ‘The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the criminal justice system’, the chief inspectors said the justice system ‘continues to operate at unacceptable levels’. They said the average a case has been outstanding by the time a Crown Court trial begins is 282 days, which ‘has a damaging impact on justice itself’.

‘The burden on police, the CPS and court staff of the live caseloads and backlogs in the courts is immense. Ensuring, over extended periods, that cases are and stay ready for trial, that serious or complex cases and custody cases are prioritised, and that victims and witnesses are kept on board is very challenging.’

In non-London areas, the ‘availability of external advocates is a real issue… the pandemic resulted in barristers leaving the self-employed Bar and even as things return to normal, many have not returned’, the report said.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘It is particularly compelling to see the four HM Chief Inspectors—who have no vested interest when it comes to defence practitioners—echoing our concerns about the urgent need for investment in defence practice if there is to be any prospect of clearing the court backlogs.

‘Sustained investment is needed across the criminal justice system and, as the report points out, the plan must be coordinated for the system to recover.’

Official figures for March show a drop in the backlog of 500 cases to 57,838 outstanding cases in the Crown Court.

Professor Chris Bones, chair of CILEX, said: ‘Allowing prosecutors who trained via the CILEX route to become Crown Prosecutors would help alleviate these pressures.’

View the full report here.
Issue: 7979 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Firm expands in London and Leeds with dual merger

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Private wealth and real estate firmpromotes two to partner and five to senior associate

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Agile firm expands employment team with two partner hires

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll