header-logo header-logo

Justice system must learn from Malkinson

25 July 2024
Issue: 8081 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail
The criminal justice system must have a ‘culture’ where ‘it is acknowledged that mistakes can be made’, Chris Henley KC has said, in his independent review of the Andrew Malkinson case
Malkinson was wrongly convicted of rape in 2004 and served 17 years for a crime that he did not commit. His conviction was quashed last summer, after the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) rejected the first two of Malkinson’s three applications despite the emergence of new DNA evidence.

The Henley review’s nine recommendations, published last week, include annual training for all CCRC staff on interpretation of DNA evidence, and that any decision not to obtain a police file be accompanied by a ‘full written justification’.

Henley said the case exemplifies the ‘fundamental importance of full and transparent pre-trial disclosure of all relevant material to the defence’ and ‘provides a lesson about the very strong emotional pull of identification evidence, not only on a jury but also on legal professionals and judges, and its fallibility, even when it comes from multiple witnesses, which is so difficult to assess. The profoundly mistaken verdicts in this case underscore the danger of relying on identification evidence in the absence of any other independent supporting evidence’. 

CCRC chair Helen Pitcher expressed ‘sincere regret and an unreserved apology’. The Lord Chancellor, Shabana Mahmood, has begun the process to remove Pitcher from her post. 

Jon Robins, lecturer in criminology at Brighton University and NLJ columnist, said: ‘If the CCRC has done one job well, then it has been providing cover for other parts of a failing criminal appeals system. A main theme of the report is the “deep-seated, system-wide, cultural reluctance” starting “right at the top in the Court of Appeal” to acknowledge our justice system will on occasion make mistakes. 

‘The rot set in before Helen Pitcher joined, but she needs to go because there’s nothing in the CCRC’s communications with the outside world that they recognise there is a problem.’ 

Robins added that recent analysis shows just 16 convictions have been overturned as a result of the CCRC’s investigative work over the last eight years.

Issue: 8081 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll