header-logo header-logo

Justice system must learn from Malkinson

25 July 2024
Issue: 8081 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail
The criminal justice system must have a ‘culture’ where ‘it is acknowledged that mistakes can be made’, Chris Henley KC has said, in his independent review of the Andrew Malkinson case
Malkinson was wrongly convicted of rape in 2004 and served 17 years for a crime that he did not commit. His conviction was quashed last summer, after the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) rejected the first two of Malkinson’s three applications despite the emergence of new DNA evidence.

The Henley review’s nine recommendations, published last week, include annual training for all CCRC staff on interpretation of DNA evidence, and that any decision not to obtain a police file be accompanied by a ‘full written justification’.

Henley said the case exemplifies the ‘fundamental importance of full and transparent pre-trial disclosure of all relevant material to the defence’ and ‘provides a lesson about the very strong emotional pull of identification evidence, not only on a jury but also on legal professionals and judges, and its fallibility, even when it comes from multiple witnesses, which is so difficult to assess. The profoundly mistaken verdicts in this case underscore the danger of relying on identification evidence in the absence of any other independent supporting evidence’. 

CCRC chair Helen Pitcher expressed ‘sincere regret and an unreserved apology’. The Lord Chancellor, Shabana Mahmood, has begun the process to remove Pitcher from her post. 

Jon Robins, lecturer in criminology at Brighton University and NLJ columnist, said: ‘If the CCRC has done one job well, then it has been providing cover for other parts of a failing criminal appeals system. A main theme of the report is the “deep-seated, system-wide, cultural reluctance” starting “right at the top in the Court of Appeal” to acknowledge our justice system will on occasion make mistakes. 

‘The rot set in before Helen Pitcher joined, but she needs to go because there’s nothing in the CCRC’s communications with the outside world that they recognise there is a problem.’ 

Robins added that recent analysis shows just 16 convictions have been overturned as a result of the CCRC’s investigative work over the last eight years.

Issue: 8081 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

mfg Solicitors—Brian Hession

mfg Solicitors—Brian Hession

Birmingham commercial property team bolstered by partner hire

STEP—Sara Morgan

STEP—Sara Morgan

Fieldfisher director re-elected as deputy chair of England Wales committee

Osborne Clarke—Andrew Eaton

Osborne Clarke—Andrew Eaton

Restructuring and insolvency expert joins as partner

NEWS
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Artificial intelligence may be revolutionising the law, but its misuse could wreck cases and careers, warns Clare Arthurs of Penningtons Manches Cooper in this week's NLJ
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
back-to-top-scroll