header-logo header-logo

25 July 2024
Issue: 8081 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail

Justice system must learn from Malkinson

The criminal justice system must have a ‘culture’ where ‘it is acknowledged that mistakes can be made’, Chris Henley KC has said, in his independent review of the Andrew Malkinson case
Malkinson was wrongly convicted of rape in 2004 and served 17 years for a crime that he did not commit. His conviction was quashed last summer, after the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) rejected the first two of Malkinson’s three applications despite the emergence of new DNA evidence.

The Henley review’s nine recommendations, published last week, include annual training for all CCRC staff on interpretation of DNA evidence, and that any decision not to obtain a police file be accompanied by a ‘full written justification’.

Henley said the case exemplifies the ‘fundamental importance of full and transparent pre-trial disclosure of all relevant material to the defence’ and ‘provides a lesson about the very strong emotional pull of identification evidence, not only on a jury but also on legal professionals and judges, and its fallibility, even when it comes from multiple witnesses, which is so difficult to assess. The profoundly mistaken verdicts in this case underscore the danger of relying on identification evidence in the absence of any other independent supporting evidence’. 

CCRC chair Helen Pitcher expressed ‘sincere regret and an unreserved apology’. The Lord Chancellor, Shabana Mahmood, has begun the process to remove Pitcher from her post. 

Jon Robins, lecturer in criminology at Brighton University and NLJ columnist, said: ‘If the CCRC has done one job well, then it has been providing cover for other parts of a failing criminal appeals system. A main theme of the report is the “deep-seated, system-wide, cultural reluctance” starting “right at the top in the Court of Appeal” to acknowledge our justice system will on occasion make mistakes. 

‘The rot set in before Helen Pitcher joined, but she needs to go because there’s nothing in the CCRC’s communications with the outside world that they recognise there is a problem.’ 

Robins added that recent analysis shows just 16 convictions have been overturned as a result of the CCRC’s investigative work over the last eight years.

Issue: 8081 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll