header-logo header-logo

Justices out on the stump

02 December 2011 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7492 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Listen & learn, says Roger Smith, the judges are speaking

Lady Hale, the first woman justice on the Supreme Court bench, provided a fascinating glimpse of her career and the issues currently facing the court at a Justice Student Human Rights Network conference at the College of Law. Along with her customary good humour, there were flashes of the steel that you would expect from someone who got a starred first from Cambridge.

Few would cavil at her appointment to the Supreme Court on any test of “merit”. And she is firmly of the view that she should not be alone: the court should better reflect the diversity of its society. She says women on the bench matter because of the experience that they bring. Her empathy has certainly been identified as distinct: “Only Baroness Hale—a woman —had the decency to consider how my family and I feel. It’s as if the other law lords cannot contemplate our feelings at all,” said Mrs Gentle whose case for an inquiry into the Iraq War

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll