header-logo header-logo

02 December 2011 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7492 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Justices out on the stump

Listen & learn, says Roger Smith, the judges are speaking

Lady Hale, the first woman justice on the Supreme Court bench, provided a fascinating glimpse of her career and the issues currently facing the court at a Justice Student Human Rights Network conference at the College of Law. Along with her customary good humour, there were flashes of the steel that you would expect from someone who got a starred first from Cambridge.

Few would cavil at her appointment to the Supreme Court on any test of “merit”. And she is firmly of the view that she should not be alone: the court should better reflect the diversity of its society. She says women on the bench matter because of the experience that they bring. Her empathy has certainly been identified as distinct: “Only Baroness Hale—a woman —had the decency to consider how my family and I feel. It’s as if the other law lords cannot contemplate our feelings at all,” said Mrs Gentle whose case for an inquiry into the Iraq War

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll