header-logo header-logo

10 March 2021
Issue: 7924 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Health & safety , Profession
printer mail-detail

Keep courts infection-free

Concerns around COVID-19 safety measures as Isleworth falls short

Lawyers have expressed fears about safety in court after Isleworth Crown Court failed a Health and Safety Executive (HSE) COVID-19 inspection on cleaning and social distancing measures.

The inspector visited the court on 29 January and identified contraventions relating to ‘cleaning regimes, social distancing and the monitoring of occupancy levels within the building’, an HSE spokesperson said. HM Courts and Tribunals (HMCTS) have been issued with a notification of contravention and asked to respond to the inspector by 12 April.

Solicitors have raised concerns with the Law Society about potential risks at courts throughout the pandemic. These have included concerns about the enforcement of face masks in public and communal areas, the frequency of cleaning, and having to take instructions in confined and unventilated rooms where social distancing is impossible to maintain. Solicitors have complained of being required to attend court in-person for matters they believed could reasonably be dealt with via remote means.

Law Society president David Greene said: ‘Even though we may be seeing a planned exit from the pandemic it remains absolutely essential that all court users can be assured of the safety of the court environment.

‘If that cannot be assured, as appears to be the case at Isleworth, HMCTS must take immediate action―including possibly closing a court―until it can be.’ 

Safety measures such as plexiglass screens, social distancing marks and frequent cleaning have been implemented to keep court users safe.

However, fears about unsafe courts emerged in January, when the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) revealed figures showing 434 court staff, 69 judges and magistrates, 23 jurors and 73 other court users tested positive for COVID-19 between 24 November 2020 and 11 January 2021. Cases were confirmed at 196 courts within the same period.

The MoJ pointed out that this rate tracked the national average and it should not be assumed that infection took place at court.

Issue: 7924 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Health & safety , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll