header-logo header-logo

Keep an eye on the judges

17 June 2010 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7422 / Categories: Blogs , Profession
printer mail-detail

Geoffrey Bindman is reminded of the fine balance between judicial independence & democracy

The death of Professor John Griffith of LSE at the age of 91 reminds us of his most famous book The Politics of the Judiciary first published in 1977. Its aim was to explode the myth of judicial objectivity. His claim was that judges were influenced in reaching their decisions—albeit unintentionally—by their particular experience, including their education and social background.
While today this seems so obvious as to be beyond debate, John Griffith met with considerable hostility from many in the profession, especially some senior judges. Of course the background of most judges was in the affluent middle and upper class and their education at public schools and Oxbridge. It still is. But it was Griffith who made the argument that this exclusivity affected their ability to be impartial and to understand the cases coming before them.

Lord Denning was scathing. “The youngsters believe we come from a narrow background—it’s all nonsense—they get it from that man

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll