header-logo header-logo

17 June 2010 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7422 / Categories: Blogs , Profession
printer mail-detail

Keep an eye on the judges

Geoffrey Bindman is reminded of the fine balance between judicial independence & democracy

The death of Professor John Griffith of LSE at the age of 91 reminds us of his most famous book The Politics of the Judiciary first published in 1977. Its aim was to explode the myth of judicial objectivity. His claim was that judges were influenced in reaching their decisions—albeit unintentionally—by their particular experience, including their education and social background.
While today this seems so obvious as to be beyond debate, John Griffith met with considerable hostility from many in the profession, especially some senior judges. Of course the background of most judges was in the affluent middle and upper class and their education at public schools and Oxbridge. It still is. But it was Griffith who made the argument that this exclusivity affected their ability to be impartial and to understand the cases coming before them.

Lord Denning was scathing. “The youngsters believe we come from a narrow background—it’s all nonsense—they get it from that man

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll