header-logo header-logo

17 June 2010 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7422 / Categories: Blogs , Profession
printer mail-detail

Keep an eye on the judges

Geoffrey Bindman is reminded of the fine balance between judicial independence & democracy

The death of Professor John Griffith of LSE at the age of 91 reminds us of his most famous book The Politics of the Judiciary first published in 1977. Its aim was to explode the myth of judicial objectivity. His claim was that judges were influenced in reaching their decisions—albeit unintentionally—by their particular experience, including their education and social background.
While today this seems so obvious as to be beyond debate, John Griffith met with considerable hostility from many in the profession, especially some senior judges. Of course the background of most judges was in the affluent middle and upper class and their education at public schools and Oxbridge. It still is. But it was Griffith who made the argument that this exclusivity affected their ability to be impartial and to understand the cases coming before them.

Lord Denning was scathing. “The youngsters believe we come from a narrow background—it’s all nonsense—they get it from that man

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll