header-logo header-logo

30 September 2010 / Jack Harris
Issue: 7435 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Keep out

Jack Harris reports on the duty of landowners towards uninvited guests

The recent judgment of the Court of Appeal in the case of Harvey v Plymouth City Council [2010] EWCA Civ 860 will be welcomed by local authorities, commercial landowners and their insurers.

The Court of Appeal reversed the decision of the judge at first instance so as to dismiss the claim of a young man, who had injured himself in reckless late night horseplay on the council’s land. In doing so the court confirmed that a landowner owes a duty under the Occupiers Liability Act 1957 (the 1957 Act) only to those who use its land within the terms of the licence granted to them by the landowner.

The facts

The claimant had travelled back in a taxi from a night out with friends. He was drunk. Together with a friend he decided to run away from the taxi without paying. He ran onto an area of parkland, of which the council agreed it was occupier. The parkland had been in common usage by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—five appointments

Switalskis—five appointments

Firm expands national abuse compensation team

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

IP firm announces new partners and senior promotions across UK offices

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen promotes five lawyers to the partnership

NEWS
A High Court ruling has sent a jolt through the legal profession after a newly qualified solicitor used an internal AI tool to produce court correspondence containing a fabricated legal citation
A significant data privacy ruling has clarified what counts as valid consent under UK data protection law
Executors may be overlooking billions of pounds in estate assets hidden in forgotten investments and misplaced share certificates
Britain’s booming non-surgical cosmetics market is operating in what some critics describe as a regulatory ‘Wild West’
Family contact disputes are becoming an increasingly prominent feature of Court of Protection litigation
back-to-top-scroll