header-logo header-logo

Keeping it in the family?

23 October 2018 / Gregor Hogan
Issue: 7814 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Gregor Hogan emphasises the need for clarity & open succession planning between the generations

  • Those advising testators should encourage clients to discuss their plans with their children to head off disputes.
  • Thought should also be given as to whether appropriate restructuring during lifetime, by way of partnership or a corporate structure, may assist.
  • Testators should be realistic, however, that when they have made a clear promise which is relied upon, they lose the freedom to dispose of the property in question completely freely.

A recent High Court case in which a dairy farmer’s son, Clive Shaw, is disputing whether he has the right to inherit his parents’ farm is another example of the rise in ‘one day this will all be yours’-type cases. Such claims rely on proprietary estoppel, which can turn a present promise as to future conduct into an immediate legal entitlement. That has attractions for would-be claimants as it can alleviate the vulnerability they face by relying, sometimes for a lengthy or open-ended period of time,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll