header-logo header-logo

Keeping it in the family?

23 October 2018 / Gregor Hogan
Issue: 7814 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Gregor Hogan emphasises the need for clarity & open succession planning between the generations

  • Those advising testators should encourage clients to discuss their plans with their children to head off disputes.
  • Thought should also be given as to whether appropriate restructuring during lifetime, by way of partnership or a corporate structure, may assist.
  • Testators should be realistic, however, that when they have made a clear promise which is relied upon, they lose the freedom to dispose of the property in question completely freely.

A recent High Court case in which a dairy farmer’s son, Clive Shaw, is disputing whether he has the right to inherit his parents’ farm is another example of the rise in ‘one day this will all be yours’-type cases. Such claims rely on proprietary estoppel, which can turn a present promise as to future conduct into an immediate legal entitlement. That has attractions for would-be claimants as it can alleviate the vulnerability they face by relying, sometimes for a lengthy or open-ended period of time,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Nigel Adams & Rehman Noormohamed

Weightmans—Nigel Adams & Rehman Noormohamed

Insurance and corporate teams in London announce double partner hire

Fieldfisher—Chris Cartmell

Fieldfisher—Chris Cartmell

Technology and data practice bolstered by partner hire

South Square—Tony Beswetherick KC

South Square—Tony Beswetherick KC

Set strengthens civil fraud and insolvency offering with new member

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
back-to-top-scroll