header-logo header-logo

Keeping it in the family?

23 October 2018 / Gregor Hogan
Issue: 7814 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Gregor Hogan emphasises the need for clarity & open succession planning between the generations

  • Those advising testators should encourage clients to discuss their plans with their children to head off disputes.
  • Thought should also be given as to whether appropriate restructuring during lifetime, by way of partnership or a corporate structure, may assist.
  • Testators should be realistic, however, that when they have made a clear promise which is relied upon, they lose the freedom to dispose of the property in question completely freely.

A recent High Court case in which a dairy farmer’s son, Clive Shaw, is disputing whether he has the right to inherit his parents’ farm is another example of the rise in ‘one day this will all be yours’-type cases. Such claims rely on proprietary estoppel, which can turn a present promise as to future conduct into an immediate legal entitlement. That has attractions for would-be claimants as it can alleviate the vulnerability they face by relying, sometimes for a lengthy or open-ended period of time,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll