header-logo header-logo

09 February 2012 / Tony Allen
Issue: 7500 / Categories: Features , Profession , Mediation
printer mail-detail

Keeping it neutral

Tony Allen uncovers new ways for lawyers to use a neutral mediator

It is easy to fall into set ways of thinking about jobs. Mediators and those who hire them tend to think that unless they are resolving disputes in the time-honoured way, they are not on the job. But there are many more uses for a skilled neutral mediator than simply at a “pure” mediation, and there are mediation skills which have a wider application, something under-realised and under-valued by mediators, disputants and their advisers alike.

Joint settlement meetings

Take joint settlement meetings, where there is an inevitable risk of a free-for-all without a neutral chair to suggest how the process should start and develop. A neutral chair with no stake in the outcome is free to attend to questions of balance in participation by each person, and able to dissuade wasteful theatrical walk-outs when progress is still possible.

A good neutral chair will also ensure that the important people present (often not the most vocal or articulate people) are given

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll