header-logo header-logo

09 February 2012 / Tony Allen
Issue: 7500 / Categories: Features , Profession , Mediation
printer mail-detail

Keeping it neutral

Tony Allen uncovers new ways for lawyers to use a neutral mediator

It is easy to fall into set ways of thinking about jobs. Mediators and those who hire them tend to think that unless they are resolving disputes in the time-honoured way, they are not on the job. But there are many more uses for a skilled neutral mediator than simply at a “pure” mediation, and there are mediation skills which have a wider application, something under-realised and under-valued by mediators, disputants and their advisers alike.

Joint settlement meetings

Take joint settlement meetings, where there is an inevitable risk of a free-for-all without a neutral chair to suggest how the process should start and develop. A neutral chair with no stake in the outcome is free to attend to questions of balance in participation by each person, and able to dissuade wasteful theatrical walk-outs when progress is still possible.

A good neutral chair will also ensure that the important people present (often not the most vocal or articulate people) are given

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll