header-logo header-logo

13 February 2026 / Matthew Hardcastle , Sandra Paul , Ed Cape
Issue: 8149 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Keeping pace?

242561
Ed Cape, Matthew Hardcastle & Sandra Paul look back on 40 years of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
  • The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 is 40 years old. When it was passed, it changed the face of crime investigation in England and Wales.
  • It expanded police powers but also recognised that the detention of suspects required close regulation.
  • Over the 40 years since the Act came into force, the position of suspects has been weakened by legislative changes, as well as the introduction of statutory charging, shifting police station design, the changing role of custody officers, and lack of research.

Most of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE 1984), particularly those parts governing police investigations and suspects’ rights, came into force 40 years ago, on 1 January 1986. Although enacted in 1984, the government, recognising the significant impact it would have in relation to the practice of lawyers, the police and the courts, delayed implementation in order to give time for the necessary structural

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll