header-logo header-logo

22 March 2019 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7833 / Categories: Features , Employment , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Keeping the faith

Charles Pigott reports on defining the limits of religious discrimination

  • The recent decision from the Employment Appeal Tribunal involving a worker at a Jewish nursery addresses some difficult issues about the scope the of Equality Act’s protection against discrimination because of religion or belief.

In Gan Menachem Hendon Ltd v De Groen UKEAT/0059/18 the EAT was asked to decide an appeal arising from the dismissal of Zelda de Groen from her job as a teacher at the Gan Menachem Kindergarten.

Dispute

The dispute revolved around a meeting between Ms De Groen and two female members of the Kindergarten’s management, convened to discuss reports that she was living with her boyfriend. This had become known to a number of the parents and was considered to be incompatible with the kindergarten’s ethos, given that it was affiliated with the Chabad Lubavitch Hasidic movement, which espouses strict orthodox Jewish values.

Ms De Groen appears to have had, at least at that time, what could be regarded as a troubled relationship with Orthodox

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll