header-logo header-logo

22 March 2019 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7833 / Categories: Features , Employment , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Keeping the faith

Charles Pigott reports on defining the limits of religious discrimination

  • The recent decision from the Employment Appeal Tribunal involving a worker at a Jewish nursery addresses some difficult issues about the scope the of Equality Act’s protection against discrimination because of religion or belief.

In Gan Menachem Hendon Ltd v De Groen UKEAT/0059/18 the EAT was asked to decide an appeal arising from the dismissal of Zelda de Groen from her job as a teacher at the Gan Menachem Kindergarten.

Dispute

The dispute revolved around a meeting between Ms De Groen and two female members of the Kindergarten’s management, convened to discuss reports that she was living with her boyfriend. This had become known to a number of the parents and was considered to be incompatible with the kindergarten’s ethos, given that it was affiliated with the Chabad Lubavitch Hasidic movement, which espouses strict orthodox Jewish values.

Ms De Groen appears to have had, at least at that time, what could be regarded as a troubled relationship with Orthodox

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll