header-logo header-logo

29 December 2020
Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Keeping the judges in order

Disciplinary action was taken against judges in 42 cases last year, according to the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO) annual report

Two-thirds of the 1,292 complaints received by the JCIO in the reporting year 2019-2020 related to judicial decisions and therefore were not investigated.

Some 325 of the complaints related to inappropriate behaviour and comments, 33 were about judicial delay, 26 involved conflict of interest and 11 concerned misuse of judicial status.

However, 12 magistrates and two other judicial office holders were removed from office. Six reprimands were given as well as 14 formal warnings and eight issues of formal advice.

Both the number of complaints received and the sanctions issued by the Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief Justice were less than in the previous year, 1,672 and 55, respectively.

Amy Shaw, head of the JCIO, said in her introduction to the report that she was proud of her team’s efforts during the pandemic, which began towards the end of the reporting year.

‘I am glad to report that further development of our digital case management system(CMS) has enabled us to achieve our goal to become a ‘digital by default’ office,’ she said.

‘This proved to be a crucial step for the JCIO, enabling secure and effective remote working during the national lockdown. The improved CMS also enables managers to monitor and analyse the team’s performance better than ever before.’

Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
back-to-top-scroll