header-logo header-logo

10 February 2011 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Kettling matters

Richard Scorer considers the rights & wrongs of kettling

Kettling is a police method for management of large demonstrations. Cordons of police contain a crowd within a limited area. Protesters are prevented from leaving, sometimes for many hours. The controversial tactic has been used to police the recent student demonstrations, and appears likely to be the subject of legal challenge by some of the protestors. Is it lawful?

On the face of it, the containment of demonstrators within a restricted area may constitute false imprisonment and /or a breach of Art 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention), which provides that a right not to be deprived of liberty except in certain well-defined situations is an absolute right, and the argument might be even stronger where the demonstrators suffer physical injury, or are denied access to medical attention. Kettling has been the subject of several court decisions which have examined its lawfulness.

Austin v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [2009] AC 564, [2009] 3 All ER 455 was brought by a demonstrator who

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll