header-logo header-logo

Kettling matters

10 February 2011 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Richard Scorer considers the rights & wrongs of kettling

Kettling is a police method for management of large demonstrations. Cordons of police contain a crowd within a limited area. Protesters are prevented from leaving, sometimes for many hours. The controversial tactic has been used to police the recent student demonstrations, and appears likely to be the subject of legal challenge by some of the protestors. Is it lawful?

On the face of it, the containment of demonstrators within a restricted area may constitute false imprisonment and /or a breach of Art 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention), which provides that a right not to be deprived of liberty except in certain well-defined situations is an absolute right, and the argument might be even stronger where the demonstrators suffer physical injury, or are denied access to medical attention. Kettling has been the subject of several court decisions which have examined its lawfulness.

Austin v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [2009] AC 564, [2009] 3 All ER 455 was brought by a demonstrator who

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll