header-logo header-logo

Kettling matters

10 February 2011 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Richard Scorer considers the rights & wrongs of kettling

Kettling is a police method for management of large demonstrations. Cordons of police contain a crowd within a limited area. Protesters are prevented from leaving, sometimes for many hours. The controversial tactic has been used to police the recent student demonstrations, and appears likely to be the subject of legal challenge by some of the protestors. Is it lawful?

On the face of it, the containment of demonstrators within a restricted area may constitute false imprisonment and /or a breach of Art 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention), which provides that a right not to be deprived of liberty except in certain well-defined situations is an absolute right, and the argument might be even stronger where the demonstrators suffer physical injury, or are denied access to medical attention. Kettling has been the subject of several court decisions which have examined its lawfulness.

Austin v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [2009] AC 564, [2009] 3 All ER 455 was brought by a demonstrator who

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll