header-logo header-logo

Kettling matters

10 February 2011 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Richard Scorer considers the rights & wrongs of kettling

Kettling is a police method for management of large demonstrations. Cordons of police contain a crowd within a limited area. Protesters are prevented from leaving, sometimes for many hours. The controversial tactic has been used to police the recent student demonstrations, and appears likely to be the subject of legal challenge by some of the protestors. Is it lawful?

On the face of it, the containment of demonstrators within a restricted area may constitute false imprisonment and /or a breach of Art 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention), which provides that a right not to be deprived of liberty except in certain well-defined situations is an absolute right, and the argument might be even stronger where the demonstrators suffer physical injury, or are denied access to medical attention. Kettling has been the subject of several court decisions which have examined its lawfulness.

Austin v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [2009] AC 564, [2009] 3 All ER 455 was brought by a demonstrator who

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll