header-logo header-logo

Kill Bill 2?

Paul Brehony & Iain Daniels explain why directors are losing sleep over new health & safety legislation

Just when directors thought it was safe to take off their tin hats in the aftermath of corporate manslaughter and Companies Act legislation, they now face another legal minefield exposing them to further personal liability—the Health and Safety (Offences) Act 2009 (HS(O)A 2009).

As any solicitor or counsel who has advised clients on the implications of the Corporate Manslaughter and Homicide Act 2007 (CMCHA 2007) will confirm, the single issue causing businesses most concern was the almost universal misperception within the business community was that it targeted and penalised individuals; specifically individuals in senior management positions. The reality is that an individual cannot be liable under the legislation, however, as a result of the attention CMCHA 2007 has attracted, a piece of legislation carrying a far greater threat of personal liability for senior managers has slipped under most businesses’ radar screens.
Both contentious and non contentious lawyers who have been advising boards about
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll