header-logo header-logo

King’s Speech: Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s long list of priorities

17 July 2024
Issue: 8080 / Categories: Legal News , Planning , Employment , Equality , Pensions , Arbitration , Criminal , Public
printer mail-detail

Planning and employment law reform took top billing in the King’s Speech, among an ambitious agenda of more than 35 bills

The Planning and Infrastructure Bill will reform compulsory purchase compensation, modernise planning committees and speed up decision-making.

The Employment Rights Bill ‘will deliver a genuine living wage that accounts for the cost of living’, ban exploitative zero-hours contracts and ‘fire-and-rehire’ practices, and make parental leave, sick pay and protection from unfair dismissal available from day one. However, probationary periods for new hires will stay. Statutory sick pay will be available to ‘all workers’. Flexible working will ‘be the default from day one for all workers, with employers required to accommodate this as far as is reasonable’.

Law Society president Nick Emmerson welcomed the bill’s ‘focus on improving dispute resolution and enforcement’.

Workers’ rights will be further strengthened by the draft Equality (Race and Disability) Bill to enshrine the right to equal pay in law.

Pensions are due a shake-up, with the Pension Schemes Bill increasing duties on private pension providers and reaffirming the Pensions Ombudsman as a competent court.

The government will bring forward the Law Commission’s recommendations for an Arbitration Bill, strengthening arbitrator immunity and empowering arbitrators to summarily dismiss unrealistic cases.

Other bills will allow associate prosecutors to work on appropriate cases and create specialist courts at every Crown Court to fast-track rape cases.

The government will also continue some unfinished business of the previous incumbents, notably the Renters’ Rights Bill, the draft Leasehold and Commonhold Reform Bill, and the Tobacco and Vapes Bill.

Emmerson called for increased access to housing legal aid and resources for the courts, to ‘ensure an appropriate balance between tenants’ rights and landlords’ routes’.

The Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill (Martyn’s law) will help keep public venues safe from terrorism. Paul Tarne, partner, Weightmans, said: ‘The law will need its own regulatory scheme and a body to manage it. Striking the right balance will be key.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll