header-logo header-logo

28 June 2024 / Mark Pawlowski
Issue: 8077 / Categories: Features , Privacy , Freedom of Information
printer mail-detail

Privacy law: kiss, don’t tell!

179414
Privacy or freedom of expression? Mark Pawlowski surveys the laws covering gossip & scandal
  • Sets out case law on publication and the prevention of publication.

Facts within the public domain?

In Stephens v Avery [1988] Ch 449, [1988] 2 All ER 477 the claimant communicated information to the defendant relating to her sexual conduct with another woman. Subsequent details of the relationship appeared in a newspaper article. Sir Nicholas Browne-Wilkinson VC held that equity would intervene to protect confidential information on the basis it was unconscionable for the recipient to reveal that information and that was so whether it had been given expressly in confidence or by implication where the relationship between the parties imposed a duty of confidence. In the words of the Vice-Chancellor, at [454]: ‘To most people the details of their sexual lives are high on their list of those matters which they regard as confidential. If in fact information is secret, then in my judgment it is capable of being kept secret by the imposition

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll