header-logo header-logo

08 September 2023 / Dr Graham Zellick CBE KC FAcSS
Issue: 8039 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Knights in scarlet

136499
Graham Zellick looks into the pros, cons & wherewithals of knighthoods & damehoods for High Court judges
  • Examines the arguments for and against the conferring of titles on High Court judges when those titles are not used in court.

The custom of knighting the king’s judges originated in the days when judges were very few in number, were seen as emissaries of the king in dispensing his justice throughout the realm, and when it was commonplace to confer the accolade of knighthood on everyone holding high public office. There was at that time no Court of Appeal or Law Lords, so the king’s judges sat at the apex of the rudimentary justice system.

There is no other occupational group which now receives knighthoods or the female equivalent (DBE, DCMG, DCB) on appointment. There are many offices that typically attract such an honour either some way into the appointment or on retirement (for example, permanent secretaries and their equivalent, senior ambassadors, three-star rank in the armed forces, the Metropolitan

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll