header-logo header-logo

08 September 2023 / Dr Graham Zellick CBE KC FAcSS
Issue: 8039 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Knights in scarlet

136499
Graham Zellick looks into the pros, cons & wherewithals of knighthoods & damehoods for High Court judges
  • Examines the arguments for and against the conferring of titles on High Court judges when those titles are not used in court.

The custom of knighting the king’s judges originated in the days when judges were very few in number, were seen as emissaries of the king in dispensing his justice throughout the realm, and when it was commonplace to confer the accolade of knighthood on everyone holding high public office. There was at that time no Court of Appeal or Law Lords, so the king’s judges sat at the apex of the rudimentary justice system.

There is no other occupational group which now receives knighthoods or the female equivalent (DBE, DCMG, DCB) on appointment. There are many offices that typically attract such an honour either some way into the appointment or on retirement (for example, permanent secretaries and their equivalent, senior ambassadors, three-star rank in the armed forces, the Metropolitan

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll