header-logo header-logo

29 September 2021
Issue: 7950 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal aid focus , Pro Bono
printer mail-detail

Labour would set pro bono targets

City firms would have to meet a national pro bono target to be eligible for government contracts, under proposals announced by Shadow Justice Secretary David Lammy MP

Speaking at the Labour Party conference in Brighton this week, Lammy said the requirement would be at least 35 hours of pro bono legal services per lawyer per year. A legally binding target of 20 hours per lawyer will be set for in-house legal teams at organisations seeking government contracts.

He would create a state-run national pro bono centre alongside the target to encourage partnership between the public and private sector. The centre would promote awareness, offer practical tools and resources to reduce barriers to participation and connect individuals taking part. The pro bono target can be signed up to by law firms, individual law firm solicitors, barristers and barristers’ chambers.

City firms announced record profits this year, with full equity partners at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Allen & Overy and Clifford Chance taking home £1.91m, £1.9m and £1.85m, respectively.

In April 2013, the government removed legal aid from large areas of civil law, for example, those in need of housing law help were suddenly unable to obtain legal aid help unless they were in imminent risk of homelessness.

Lammy said: ‘City Law firms are making billions in profit, while low-paid workers see their tax bill rise and wages fall.

‘This party recognises the importance of the private sector doing their bit in partnership with the public sector.’

Lammy also called for a ‘turning point’ in tackling violence against women, following several recent high-profile murders of women out walking. He reaffirmed Labour’s current commitment to fast-track rape and sexual assault cases, increased minimum sentences for rapists, the creation of a new offence of street harassment, ensuring victims of domestic abuse get legal aid and making misogyny a hate crime.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said pro bono plays an important role in access to justice but should never be a substitute for legal aid―lawyers currently provide an estimated £7m worth of pro bono advice per year, while legal aid delivers about £1.7bn worth.

 

Issue: 7950 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal aid focus , Pro Bono
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll