header-logo header-logo

Lack of resources fuels delays in employment tribunals

31 July 2019
Issue: 7851 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Tribunals
printer mail-detail
Delays in employment cases have hit a record high as overburdened tribunals struggle to deal with the volume of claims, lawyers have warned.

The average waiting time between the tribunal receiving a claim and hearing it has reached eight months (237 days), up 14% from 207 days last year. Some new claims, for example, at Croydon Employment Tribunal, may not be heard until 2021.

Raoul Parekh, partner at employment law firm GQ|Littler, said the delays were ‘just not sustainable… Many businesses facing an employment claim feel like they are operating under a cloud until that claim is dealt with.

‘On this kind of timeline, it is not uncommon for key witnesses to leave, move to other roles or countries, and memories can also fade. A severe lack of resources means delays are endemic across the whole tribunals system—even when calling the employment tribunals enquiries helpline, you can be waiting for hours.’

One way to improve waiting times, he said, might be to introduce an extra step in the tribunals process which gives both parties a chance to settle before a case is heard.

Waiting times have now risen for four years in a row, as HM Courts & Tribunals Service struggled to employ enough salaried judges and key administrative support staff. Moreover, the abolition of tribunal fees in July 2017 contributed to a 27% spike in claims received in 2018–19.

To help address the growing waiting time and backlog of cases, the Judicial Appointments Commission launched a recruitment drive earlier this year to hire an extra 54 salaried employment tribunals judges. As of July 2019, some 27 have been appointed.  

Issue: 7851 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Tribunals
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll