header-logo header-logo

31 July 2019
Issue: 7851 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Tribunals
printer mail-detail

Lack of resources fuels delays in employment tribunals

Delays in employment cases have hit a record high as overburdened tribunals struggle to deal with the volume of claims, lawyers have warned.

The average waiting time between the tribunal receiving a claim and hearing it has reached eight months (237 days), up 14% from 207 days last year. Some new claims, for example, at Croydon Employment Tribunal, may not be heard until 2021.

Raoul Parekh, partner at employment law firm GQ|Littler, said the delays were ‘just not sustainable… Many businesses facing an employment claim feel like they are operating under a cloud until that claim is dealt with.

‘On this kind of timeline, it is not uncommon for key witnesses to leave, move to other roles or countries, and memories can also fade. A severe lack of resources means delays are endemic across the whole tribunals system—even when calling the employment tribunals enquiries helpline, you can be waiting for hours.’

One way to improve waiting times, he said, might be to introduce an extra step in the tribunals process which gives both parties a chance to settle before a case is heard.

Waiting times have now risen for four years in a row, as HM Courts & Tribunals Service struggled to employ enough salaried judges and key administrative support staff. Moreover, the abolition of tribunal fees in July 2017 contributed to a 27% spike in claims received in 2018–19.

To help address the growing waiting time and backlog of cases, the Judicial Appointments Commission launched a recruitment drive earlier this year to hire an extra 54 salaried employment tribunals judges. As of July 2019, some 27 have been appointed.  

Issue: 7851 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Tribunals
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll