header-logo header-logo

Lack of resources fuels delays in employment tribunals

31 July 2019
Issue: 7851 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Tribunals
printer mail-detail
Delays in employment cases have hit a record high as overburdened tribunals struggle to deal with the volume of claims, lawyers have warned.

The average waiting time between the tribunal receiving a claim and hearing it has reached eight months (237 days), up 14% from 207 days last year. Some new claims, for example, at Croydon Employment Tribunal, may not be heard until 2021.

Raoul Parekh, partner at employment law firm GQ|Littler, said the delays were ‘just not sustainable… Many businesses facing an employment claim feel like they are operating under a cloud until that claim is dealt with.

‘On this kind of timeline, it is not uncommon for key witnesses to leave, move to other roles or countries, and memories can also fade. A severe lack of resources means delays are endemic across the whole tribunals system—even when calling the employment tribunals enquiries helpline, you can be waiting for hours.’

One way to improve waiting times, he said, might be to introduce an extra step in the tribunals process which gives both parties a chance to settle before a case is heard.

Waiting times have now risen for four years in a row, as HM Courts & Tribunals Service struggled to employ enough salaried judges and key administrative support staff. Moreover, the abolition of tribunal fees in July 2017 contributed to a 27% spike in claims received in 2018–19.

To help address the growing waiting time and backlog of cases, the Judicial Appointments Commission launched a recruitment drive earlier this year to hire an extra 54 salaried employment tribunals judges. As of July 2019, some 27 have been appointed.  

Issue: 7851 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Tribunals
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll