header-logo header-logo

31 July 2019
Issue: 7851 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Tribunals
printer mail-detail

Lack of resources fuels delays in employment tribunals

Delays in employment cases have hit a record high as overburdened tribunals struggle to deal with the volume of claims, lawyers have warned.

The average waiting time between the tribunal receiving a claim and hearing it has reached eight months (237 days), up 14% from 207 days last year. Some new claims, for example, at Croydon Employment Tribunal, may not be heard until 2021.

Raoul Parekh, partner at employment law firm GQ|Littler, said the delays were ‘just not sustainable… Many businesses facing an employment claim feel like they are operating under a cloud until that claim is dealt with.

‘On this kind of timeline, it is not uncommon for key witnesses to leave, move to other roles or countries, and memories can also fade. A severe lack of resources means delays are endemic across the whole tribunals system—even when calling the employment tribunals enquiries helpline, you can be waiting for hours.’

One way to improve waiting times, he said, might be to introduce an extra step in the tribunals process which gives both parties a chance to settle before a case is heard.

Waiting times have now risen for four years in a row, as HM Courts & Tribunals Service struggled to employ enough salaried judges and key administrative support staff. Moreover, the abolition of tribunal fees in July 2017 contributed to a 27% spike in claims received in 2018–19.

To help address the growing waiting time and backlog of cases, the Judicial Appointments Commission launched a recruitment drive earlier this year to hire an extra 54 salaried employment tribunals judges. As of July 2019, some 27 have been appointed.  

Issue: 7851 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Tribunals
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll