header-logo header-logo

21 July 2017
Issue: 7756 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Lady Hale takes up the reins

Lady Hale is to be the next president of the Supreme Court, the prime minister’s office has confirmed. 

Brenda Hale is a family law specialist who was called to the Bar in 1969, teaching law at Manchester University until 1984 and later practising as a barrister in Manchester. She replaces Lord Neuberger, who is retiring, in October. She is the first woman to hold the premier position in the judiciary, an achievement that tops a career of firsts—she was also the first woman to become a Lady Justice of Appeal and the first, and only, female justice at the Supreme Court.

The diversity of the judiciary came under scrutiny earlier this week, with the release this week of judicial diversity statistics for 2017. These showed that, as of April 2017, women account for 28% of the more than 3,000 court judges in England and Wales, and 45% of tribunal judges. As a general rule, the higher the court, the fewer salaried women judges—24% of the Court of Appeal (up from 18% in 2014); 22% of the High Court (up from 18% in 2014); 28% of Registrars, Masters, Costs Judges and District Judges (Principal Registry of the Family Division); 27% of Circuit Judges; 38% of District Judges (County Courts); and 35% of District Judges (Magistrates’ Courts).

Robin Allen QC, Chair of the Bar Council's Equality and Diversity Committee, said: ‘The progress made in recruiting more female judges is to be welcomed; but there is an urgent need to increase the number of part-time salaried posts which offer a useful combination of certainty and flexibility for the large number of lawyers with caring responsibilities.

‘The Bar Council is working with the Judicial Diversity Forum to promote new schemes of positive action which could help to change this. The Lord Chancellor is urged to adopt and promote them.’

Another major discrepancy in the judiciary, however, is between barristers and solicitors. Two-thirds of court judges, and one third of tribunal judges are barristers. And while the dominance of the Bar may be a sore point for some solicitors, the judiciary faces a wider crisis of recruitment, as the Review Body on Senior Salaries’ annual report revealed earlier this week. It reported the Lord Chief Justice’s concerns about low morale at the Bench, an ‘unprecedented number of unfilled vacancies’ in the High Court this year and a ‘sudden increase in recent and forthcoming retirements from the higher judiciary’.

Notably, 34 of about 150 senior judges were due to retire this year, more than double the norm. The judiciary, the report noted, has been beset by an increased workload, dissatisfaction with the tax treatment of judicial pensions, increased numbers of litigants in person and a sense of not being valued by the government. This led the Lord Chief Justice to believe more than 100 new High Court judges could be required in the next five years.

Issue: 7756 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll