header-logo header-logo

LAG disputes MoJ figures

24 March 2011
Issue: 7458 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Proposed impact of civil legal aid cuts “based on out of date figures”

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has understated the numbers potentially hit by the proposed cuts to legal aid by more than 150,000, the Legal Action Group (LAG) has claimed.

LAG cross-checked the data presented by the MoJ in its impact assessment after being alerted by the director of the Law Centres Federation that figures for social welfare law cases were higher using the 2009/10 case data than the 2008/09 data on which the MoJ estimates were based.

LAG claims that by using the older data, the MoJ has understated the reach of its cuts. It re-assessed the figures and concluded that 653,659 people would lose out on legal advice services as opposed to the MoJ’s estimate of 502,000.

Steve Hynes, director of LAG, said: “LAG believes that the MoJ has been guilty of playing rather fast and loose in its interpretation of the figures on the impact of the proposed civil legal aid cuts.

“Our research shows that 30%more people than the government

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll