header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
18 November 2010
Issue: 7442 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Landlord & tenant—Assured tenancy—Tenancy deposit schemes

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Vision Enterprises Ltd (t/a Universal Estates) v Tiensia Honeysuckle Properties v Fletcher and others [2010] EWCA Civ 1224, [2010] All ER (D) 115 (Nov)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division Thorpe, Sedley and Rimer LJJ 
11 Nov 2010

The time by which a landlord has to have performed its obligations under ss 213 of the Housing Act 2004 (HA 2004) before it is liable to sanctions under s 214 is the date of the hearing of any application by the tenant under s 214.

James Bowen (instructed by Wandsworth and Merton Law Centre) for the claimant in the first matter. Matthew Hutchings (instructed by Brian McKenna & Co) for the defendant in the second matter. Jonathan Manning (instructed by Bury & Walkers LLP) for the claimant in the second matter. The defendants in the second matter appeared in person.

Two unrelated appeals were heard together as they raised a common issue concerning tenancy deposit schemes established under HA 2004. Section 213 imposed various obligations upon a landlord who received a tenancy deposit, including: (i) to comply

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Tightening the screws on JCT terminations
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
NLJ this week: Old rules, fresh warnings in employment law
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
NLJ this week: The rise of the ‘ChatGPT client’ rattles the profession
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
NLJ this week: Surrogacy children caught in succession gap
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
NLJ this week: Online safety law at a crossroads
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll