header-logo header-logo

Landlord & tenant—Assured tenancy—Tenancy deposit schemes

18 November 2010
Issue: 7442 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Vision Enterprises Ltd (t/a Universal Estates) v Tiensia Honeysuckle Properties v Fletcher and others [2010] EWCA Civ 1224, [2010] All ER (D) 115 (Nov)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division Thorpe, Sedley and Rimer LJJ 
11 Nov 2010

The time by which a landlord has to have performed its obligations under ss 213 of the Housing Act 2004 (HA 2004) before it is liable to sanctions under s 214 is the date of the hearing of any application by the tenant under s 214.

James Bowen (instructed by Wandsworth and Merton Law Centre) for the claimant in the first matter. Matthew Hutchings (instructed by Brian McKenna & Co) for the defendant in the second matter. Jonathan Manning (instructed by Bury & Walkers LLP) for the claimant in the second matter. The defendants in the second matter appeared in person.

Two unrelated appeals were heard together as they raised a common issue concerning tenancy deposit schemes established under HA 2004. Section 213 imposed various obligations upon a landlord who received a tenancy deposit, including: (i) to comply

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
back-to-top-scroll