header-logo header-logo

06 January 2021 / Edward Peters KC , Julia Petrenko
Issue: 7915 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Landlords stuck in the middle?

35144
Edward Peters & Julia Petrenko examine the Supreme Court’s warning to landlords who find themselves caught between leaseholders
  • In Duval v 11-13 Randolph Crescent Ltd [2020] UKSC 18, the Supreme Court held that a landlord could not, without a breach of covenant, grant a licence to a lessee to undertake works which, absent the licence, would have amounted to a breach of covenant in circumstances where the other leaseholders could require the landlord to enforce tenant covenants.
  • Practitioners should be aware that grant of a licence to one tenant by the landlord could leave the landlord exposed to a potential claim by the other leaseholders.

2020 has, for many people, been spent at home. In those circumstances, household jobs which might previously have been pushed to the bottom of the to-do list have become more pressing, and it is not surprising to hear that some home improvement stores have achieved record sales this year. Property practitioners will no doubt be familiar with advising on the construction tenant covenants

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
In this week’s NLJ, Fred Philpott, Gough Square Chambers, invites us to imagine there was no statutory limitation. What would that world be like?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll