header-logo header-logo

Landmark climate judgment

26 June 2024
Issue: 8077 / Categories: Legal News , Environment , Climate change litigation
printer mail-detail

Planning permission for oil extraction at Horse Hill, Surrey, must take into account the environmental impact of combustion emissions when the crude oil is refined and burned, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment

Surrey County Council accepted an environmental impact assessment (EIA) which assessed only direct releases of greenhouse gases (GHGs) at the site.

The council argued combustion emissions could not as a matter of law be regarded as environmental effects of the project, and the decision of whether the combustion emissions were effects of the project was a matter of evaluative judgement for the council.

By a 3–2 majority decision, however, the Supreme Court held the council’s decision was unlawful, in R (Finch on behalf of Weald Action Group) v Surrey County Council & Ors [2024] UKSC 20, [2024] All ER (D) 71 (Jun).

Delivering his judgment, Lord Leggatt said: ‘The EIA Directive does not, as I interpret it, impose obligations which are impossibly onerous and unworkable. In particular, only effects which evidence shows are likely to occur and which are capable of meaningful assessment must be assessed.’

Dissenting, Lord Sales said that the EIA Directive ‘should not be given an artificially wide interpretation’.

Rowan Smith, senior associate, Leigh Day, representing Finch, said: ‘The court recognised that, because there was no doubt the oil would be burnt and release damaging [GHG] emissions into the air, such climate impact was an indirect effect of the project and should have been assessed as part of it.

‘Crucially, the court recognised that climate change is a global problem and that the damaging impact of emissions on the climate is not limited to where they originate. This truly historic judgment has very significant implications for the future assessment of fossil fuel projects and a number of cases currently before the courts.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

mfg Solicitors—Brian Hession

mfg Solicitors—Brian Hession

Birmingham commercial property team bolstered by partner hire

STEP—Sara Morgan

STEP—Sara Morgan

Fieldfisher director re-elected as deputy chair of England Wales committee

Osborne Clarke—Andrew Eaton

Osborne Clarke—Andrew Eaton

Restructuring and insolvency expert joins as partner

NEWS
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Steven Ball of Red Lion Chambers unpacks how advances in forensic science finally unmasked Ryland Headley, jailed in 2025 for the 1967 rape and murder of 75-year-old Louisa Dunne. Preserved swabs and palm prints lay dormant for decades until DNA-17 profiling produced a billion-to-one match
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
back-to-top-scroll