header-logo header-logo

Landmark COVID-19 business interruption case

18 October 2022
Issue: 7999 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail
Bakery chain Greggs, the Slug & Lettuce and other household name businesses have won their multi-million COVID-19 business interruption insurance claims at the High Court.

Mr Justice Butcher held substantially in favour of Stonegate, Greggs and Various Eateries in three complex judgments, Stonegate Pub & Ors v Amlin Corporate, Liberty Mutual & Ors [2022] EWHC 2549 (Comm).

Stonegate, which owns 760 pubs and eateries, argued it was entitled to an indemnity in respect of three perils (disease, enforced closure, and prevention of access), that it suffered business interruption losses attributable to multiple triggers and that there was a £15m limit for each single business interruption loss (SBIL).

The insurers accepted they had liability for business interruption loss but had contended it was all attributable to ‘a single occurrence’, was to be aggregated as an SBIL subject to a £2.5m limit, and that this sum had already been paid out to Stonegate in 2020.

Similarly, insurers Zurich contended there was only one ‘single occurrence’ under Greggs’ policy, limiting the bakery to a £2.5m pay-out only.

Greggs successfully argued the £2.5m limit applied each time the Westminster and devolved governments adopted a major COVID restriction measure. Butcher J held there was a single occurrence at the outset of lockdown in March 2020 followed by separate occurrences in each jurisdiction and on each adjustment.

Butcher J also held that regulations which merely continued existing restrictions or made trivial changes did not trigger an extra £2.5m limit.

Manoj Vaghela, partner at Charles Russell Speechlys, which acted for Greggs, said: ‘This outcome vindicates Greggs commencing proceedings and has wider implications for all businesses that purchased the Resilience Insurance policies.

‘Insurers’ argument that there was only one limit available for Covid business interruption losses has been firmly rejected.’

The case now proceeds to phase 2, where the value of recoverable loss is calculated.

Issue: 7999 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll