header-logo header-logo

16 October 2008
Issue: 7341 / Categories: In-House , Legal News , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Large companies worry most about spiralling litigation

Financial services sector tops list of industries expecting increased litigation

Research by global law firm Fulbright and Jaworski LLP has found that up to 43% of large organisations expect an increase in disputes, with some in the financial services sector expecting a 50% increase.

Although business conditions have changed dramatically since the responses were submitted in July, Chris Warren-Smith, head of international financial services disputes at Fulbright, says the 2008 survey marks an interesting tipping point.

“The warning signs were already out there that the economy was about to shift into bear mode, a concern reflected by in-house lawyers who are bracing themselves for an increase in legal disputes,” he says. “The larger the company, the more concerned it is about the prospects of facing more litigation.”

Warren-Smith says the survey also highlighted concern about the one size fits all approach adopted by the Financial Services Authority (FSA).

“The problems have been most acute within the investment banks, followed by retail banks and building societies,” he says. “The concern the whole industry has is that there will be a backlash and that it won’t be managed in such a way that it allows for the independent financial advisers, wealth managers and stockbrokers to operate efficiently.”

Meanwhile, Tony Brown of Bivonas Solicitors says there is a strong case for outsourcing regulatory work to nonconflicted specialist law firms.

“Within four months of the director of enforcement at the FSA announcing that the body had three insider dealing prosecutions with more in the pipeline, world banking is on its knees,” he says.

Brown adds that one solution would be to outsource enforcement to the private sector, in particular to sub-contract the enforcement to non-conflicted specialist law firms. “This already happens in Australia and is extremely effective,” he adds.

A privatised external agency given an incentive to secure results would, Brown feels, be the best way to bring transgressors to heel and shake off the “civil service culture of regulation”.

Issue: 7341 / Categories: In-House , Legal News , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll