header-logo header-logo

LASPO backlash

26 March 2015 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7646 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail
robins_3

Jon Robins laments the foreseeable consequences of the MoJ’s legal aid vanishing act

“What would a progressive government need to do, to ensure access to justice for social welfare in the 21st century?” This is the slightly unwieldy subtitle to a new study (Magna Carta today?) published earlier this month by Unite, the country’s largest union, and Goldsmiths, University of London, which outlines a seven-point plan to give greater access to justice to the thousands of people hit by the government’s Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO).

What, indeed? As I have written before in this column, Labour’s shadow justice team has pledged to look again at cuts to the criminal legal aid budget, but have made no such commitment to review the civil cuts of April 2013. So what might other “progressive” parties do? “Reverse all of the cuts,” replied Charley Pattison, criminal defence barrister and a spokesperson for the Greens on justice issues. It’s an admirably straight response (but, then again, easy

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll