header-logo header-logo

LASPO backlash

26 March 2015 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7646 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail
robins_3

Jon Robins laments the foreseeable consequences of the MoJ’s legal aid vanishing act

“What would a progressive government need to do, to ensure access to justice for social welfare in the 21st century?” This is the slightly unwieldy subtitle to a new study (Magna Carta today?) published earlier this month by Unite, the country’s largest union, and Goldsmiths, University of London, which outlines a seven-point plan to give greater access to justice to the thousands of people hit by the government’s Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO).

What, indeed? As I have written before in this column, Labour’s shadow justice team has pledged to look again at cuts to the criminal legal aid budget, but have made no such commitment to review the civil cuts of April 2013. So what might other “progressive” parties do? “Reverse all of the cuts,” replied Charley Pattison, criminal defence barrister and a spokesperson for the Greens on justice issues. It’s an admirably straight response (but, then again, easy

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Pension sharing orders (PSOs) have quietly reached their 25th anniversary, yet remain stubbornly underused. Writing in NLJ this week, Joanna Newton of Stowe Family Law argues that this neglect risks long-term financial harm, particularly for women
A school ski trip, a confiscated phone and an unauthorised hotel-room entry culminated in a pupil’s permanent exclusion. In this week's issue of NLJ, Nicholas Dobson charts how the Court of Appeal upheld the decision despite acknowledged procedural flaws
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
back-to-top-scroll