header-logo header-logo

26 March 2015 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7646 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

LASPO backlash

robins_3

Jon Robins laments the foreseeable consequences of the MoJ’s legal aid vanishing act

“What would a progressive government need to do, to ensure access to justice for social welfare in the 21st century?” This is the slightly unwieldy subtitle to a new study (Magna Carta today?) published earlier this month by Unite, the country’s largest union, and Goldsmiths, University of London, which outlines a seven-point plan to give greater access to justice to the thousands of people hit by the government’s Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO).

What, indeed? As I have written before in this column, Labour’s shadow justice team has pledged to look again at cuts to the criminal legal aid budget, but have made no such commitment to review the civil cuts of April 2013. So what might other “progressive” parties do? “Reverse all of the cuts,” replied Charley Pattison, criminal defence barrister and a spokesperson for the Greens on justice issues. It’s an admirably straight response (but, then again, easy

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Kevin Joynes & Neil Gosling

Clarke Willmott—Kevin Joynes & Neil Gosling

Clarke Willmott bolsters housebuilder expertise in Birmingham

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Firm adds former Simmons Simmons patent head to engineering and tech team

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

Freeths strengthens its voice in national disputes with ACTAPS committee appointment

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll