header-logo header-logo

20 January 2017 / Caroline Shea KC
Issue: 7730 / Categories: Features , Competition
printer mail-detail

Last orders

nlj_7730_shea

Caroline Shea QC examines the implications of the Pubs Code 2016

  • ​Parliament has legislated to enable a pub tenant to choose at various trigger points whether to continue with a tied lease or to opt for a market rent only lease.

On 21 July 2016 the Pubs Code 2016 (the Pubs Code) came into force. The Pubs Code is secondary legislation enacted pursuant to Pt 4 of the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015 (the 2015 Act). Part 4 of the 2015 Act was enacted in response to a perception which had been gaining strength over the previous two decades that the contractual arrangements governing tied pubs were both anti-competitive and commercially unfair to the publican-tenant. Under a tied lease, in return for a lower rent the tenant is obliged to procure its beer and other alcoholic beverages either from the landlord or from a third party nominated by the landlord. Typically, the price of the beer obtained in this way is charged to the tenant at significantly (up to 60%) in excess

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll