header-logo header-logo

20 January 2017 / Caroline Shea KC
Issue: 7730 / Categories: Features , Competition
printer mail-detail

Last orders

nlj_7730_shea

Caroline Shea QC examines the implications of the Pubs Code 2016

  • ​Parliament has legislated to enable a pub tenant to choose at various trigger points whether to continue with a tied lease or to opt for a market rent only lease.

On 21 July 2016 the Pubs Code 2016 (the Pubs Code) came into force. The Pubs Code is secondary legislation enacted pursuant to Pt 4 of the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015 (the 2015 Act). Part 4 of the 2015 Act was enacted in response to a perception which had been gaining strength over the previous two decades that the contractual arrangements governing tied pubs were both anti-competitive and commercially unfair to the publican-tenant. Under a tied lease, in return for a lower rent the tenant is obliged to procure its beer and other alcoholic beverages either from the landlord or from a third party nominated by the landlord. Typically, the price of the beer obtained in this way is charged to the tenant at significantly (up to 60%) in excess

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll