header-logo header-logo

Last resort fund plans

18 February 2010
Issue: 7405 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Government proposals to set up a tracking service and fund of last resort for employees injured at work have received a mixed reaction from personal injury lawyers and insurers.

Government proposals to set up a tracking service and fund of last resort for employees injured at work have received a mixed reaction from personal injury lawyers and insurers.

The Department of Work and Pensions last week set out plans to create an Employers’ Liability Tracing Office to help people track down the insurance policies of employers from yesteryear, and an Employers’ Liability Insurance Bureau (ELIB) to provide a fund of last resort for those who are unable to trace insurers.

The consultation, Accessing Compensation—Supporting People who Need to Trace Employers’ Liability Insurance, looks at how the tracing office could be managed and funded, and how much compensation could be paid. It also considers employers can do to ensure they meet their obligations to maintain employers’ liability compulsory insurance.

Ian McFall, head of asbestos policy at Thompsons Solicitors, which has campaigned for an ELIB, says: “This positive move is as welcome as it is overdue.”The Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) called for all political parties to support the plans for an ELIB.

However, Nick Starling, the Association of British Insurers’ director of general insurance and health, says: “Over 98% of employers’ liability claimants are able to claim if they have suffered an injury or disease caused by their work, and insurers pay out £1.5bn a year in compensation.

“We are opposed in principle to the proposed ELIB. It cannot be right that today’s law-abiding employers should have to pay for their potentially uninsured competitors or firms that now no longer exist, and who may not have had insurance. Such a fund could also encourage some employers not to bother with insurance, or to take the health and safety of their employees less seriously.”
 

Issue: 7405 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll