header-logo header-logo

18 February 2010
Issue: 7405 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Last resort fund plans

Government proposals to set up a tracking service and fund of last resort for employees injured at work have received a mixed reaction from personal injury lawyers and insurers.

Government proposals to set up a tracking service and fund of last resort for employees injured at work have received a mixed reaction from personal injury lawyers and insurers.

The Department of Work and Pensions last week set out plans to create an Employers’ Liability Tracing Office to help people track down the insurance policies of employers from yesteryear, and an Employers’ Liability Insurance Bureau (ELIB) to provide a fund of last resort for those who are unable to trace insurers.

The consultation, Accessing Compensation—Supporting People who Need to Trace Employers’ Liability Insurance, looks at how the tracing office could be managed and funded, and how much compensation could be paid. It also considers employers can do to ensure they meet their obligations to maintain employers’ liability compulsory insurance.

Ian McFall, head of asbestos policy at Thompsons Solicitors, which has campaigned for an ELIB, says: “This positive move is as welcome as it is overdue.”The Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) called for all political parties to support the plans for an ELIB.

However, Nick Starling, the Association of British Insurers’ director of general insurance and health, says: “Over 98% of employers’ liability claimants are able to claim if they have suffered an injury or disease caused by their work, and insurers pay out £1.5bn a year in compensation.

“We are opposed in principle to the proposed ELIB. It cannot be right that today’s law-abiding employers should have to pay for their potentially uninsured competitors or firms that now no longer exist, and who may not have had insurance. Such a fund could also encourage some employers not to bother with insurance, or to take the health and safety of their employees less seriously.”
 

Issue: 7405 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll