header-logo header-logo

18 February 2010
Issue: 7405 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Last resort fund plans

Government proposals to set up a tracking service and fund of last resort for employees injured at work have received a mixed reaction from personal injury lawyers and insurers.

Government proposals to set up a tracking service and fund of last resort for employees injured at work have received a mixed reaction from personal injury lawyers and insurers.

The Department of Work and Pensions last week set out plans to create an Employers’ Liability Tracing Office to help people track down the insurance policies of employers from yesteryear, and an Employers’ Liability Insurance Bureau (ELIB) to provide a fund of last resort for those who are unable to trace insurers.

The consultation, Accessing Compensation—Supporting People who Need to Trace Employers’ Liability Insurance, looks at how the tracing office could be managed and funded, and how much compensation could be paid. It also considers employers can do to ensure they meet their obligations to maintain employers’ liability compulsory insurance.

Ian McFall, head of asbestos policy at Thompsons Solicitors, which has campaigned for an ELIB, says: “This positive move is as welcome as it is overdue.”The Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) called for all political parties to support the plans for an ELIB.

However, Nick Starling, the Association of British Insurers’ director of general insurance and health, says: “Over 98% of employers’ liability claimants are able to claim if they have suffered an injury or disease caused by their work, and insurers pay out £1.5bn a year in compensation.

“We are opposed in principle to the proposed ELIB. It cannot be right that today’s law-abiding employers should have to pay for their potentially uninsured competitors or firms that now no longer exist, and who may not have had insurance. Such a fund could also encourage some employers not to bother with insurance, or to take the health and safety of their employees less seriously.”
 

Issue: 7405 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll