header-logo header-logo

04 February 2010 / Roderick Ramage
Issue: 7403 / Categories: Blogs , Profession
printer mail-detail

Law in 101 words

Snippets from The Reduced Law Dictionary by Roderick Ramage

Affirmative and negative affirmation procedures

Statutory Instruments required to be laid before Parliament come into operation on the date stated without further procedure: Statutory Instruments Act 1946 s4.  If an Act provides for an instrument to be subject to annulment (the negative affirmation procedure) it may be annulled as a result of a resolution of either House of Parliament within forty days: ibid s5. 

The affirmative resolution procedure requires that a draft of the instrument is laid before Parliament and is approved by a resolution.  The European Communities Act 1972 Sch 2 para 2 provides that an instrument not subject to approval is subject to annulment.

Drafting documents

The draftsman must ascertain his client’s intention and the law. Conventionally a document starts with its brief description, date and the names of the parties, recites any background facts which are necessary and then continues with the operative clauses, moving from general to the detail, sometimes putting the latter into schedules. He must include everything that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll