header-logo header-logo

04 February 2010 / Roderick Ramage
Issue: 7403 / Categories: Blogs , Profession
printer mail-detail

Law in 101 words

Snippets from The Reduced Law Dictionary by Roderick Ramage

Affirmative and negative affirmation procedures

Statutory Instruments required to be laid before Parliament come into operation on the date stated without further procedure: Statutory Instruments Act 1946 s4.  If an Act provides for an instrument to be subject to annulment (the negative affirmation procedure) it may be annulled as a result of a resolution of either House of Parliament within forty days: ibid s5. 

The affirmative resolution procedure requires that a draft of the instrument is laid before Parliament and is approved by a resolution.  The European Communities Act 1972 Sch 2 para 2 provides that an instrument not subject to approval is subject to annulment.

Drafting documents

The draftsman must ascertain his client’s intention and the law. Conventionally a document starts with its brief description, date and the names of the parties, recites any background facts which are necessary and then continues with the operative clauses, moving from general to the detail, sometimes putting the latter into schedules. He must include everything that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll