header-logo header-logo

Law in 101 words

26 February 2009 / Roderick Ramage
Issue: 7358 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Terms&conditions , Employment
printer mail-detail

Snippets from The Reduced Law Dictionary by Roderick Ramage

Apportionment of holiday pay Mr Jenkins’ employment ended with some holiday entitlement not taken. His employer, purporting to apply the Apportionment Act 1870, divided his annual pay by 365 and multiplying it by the 14.5 days’ holiday not taken. He complained that the portion of his salary had been calculated with reference to a seven-day week while the period of his holiday entitlement had been calculated with reference to a five-day week. In Jenkins v IACR Rothamsted [2001], the EAT agreed. Nothing in the Act required like to be compared with unlike. The daily rate of pay had to be multiplied by 20.5.

 

Bonus and maternity pay

Don’t go on maternity leave at bonus time. In Lewen v Dender [2000], the ECJ said that where a bonus is a reward for work done, the employer may reduce it proportionately for an employee’s absence on maternity leave, but (proving that the ECJ is reality detached) if it is to encourage

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll