header-logo header-logo

26 February 2009 / Roderick Ramage
Issue: 7358 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Terms&conditions , Employment
printer mail-detail

Law in 101 words

Snippets from The Reduced Law Dictionary by Roderick Ramage

Apportionment of holiday pay Mr Jenkins’ employment ended with some holiday entitlement not taken. His employer, purporting to apply the Apportionment Act 1870, divided his annual pay by 365 and multiplying it by the 14.5 days’ holiday not taken. He complained that the portion of his salary had been calculated with reference to a seven-day week while the period of his holiday entitlement had been calculated with reference to a five-day week. In Jenkins v IACR Rothamsted [2001], the EAT agreed. Nothing in the Act required like to be compared with unlike. The daily rate of pay had to be multiplied by 20.5.

 

Bonus and maternity pay

Don’t go on maternity leave at bonus time. In Lewen v Dender [2000], the ECJ said that where a bonus is a reward for work done, the employer may reduce it proportionately for an employee’s absence on maternity leave, but (proving that the ECJ is reality detached) if it is to encourage

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll