header-logo header-logo

26 February 2009 / Roderick Ramage
Issue: 7358 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Terms&conditions , Employment
printer mail-detail

Law in 101 words

Snippets from The Reduced Law Dictionary by Roderick Ramage

Apportionment of holiday pay Mr Jenkins’ employment ended with some holiday entitlement not taken. His employer, purporting to apply the Apportionment Act 1870, divided his annual pay by 365 and multiplying it by the 14.5 days’ holiday not taken. He complained that the portion of his salary had been calculated with reference to a seven-day week while the period of his holiday entitlement had been calculated with reference to a five-day week. In Jenkins v IACR Rothamsted [2001], the EAT agreed. Nothing in the Act required like to be compared with unlike. The daily rate of pay had to be multiplied by 20.5.

 

Bonus and maternity pay

Don’t go on maternity leave at bonus time. In Lewen v Dender [2000], the ECJ said that where a bonus is a reward for work done, the employer may reduce it proportionately for an employee’s absence on maternity leave, but (proving that the ECJ is reality detached) if it is to encourage

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll