header-logo header-logo

Law in 101 words

26 February 2009 / Roderick Ramage
Issue: 7358 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Terms&conditions , Employment
printer mail-detail

Snippets from The Reduced Law Dictionary by Roderick Ramage

Apportionment of holiday pay Mr Jenkins’ employment ended with some holiday entitlement not taken. His employer, purporting to apply the Apportionment Act 1870, divided his annual pay by 365 and multiplying it by the 14.5 days’ holiday not taken. He complained that the portion of his salary had been calculated with reference to a seven-day week while the period of his holiday entitlement had been calculated with reference to a five-day week. In Jenkins v IACR Rothamsted [2001], the EAT agreed. Nothing in the Act required like to be compared with unlike. The daily rate of pay had to be multiplied by 20.5.

 

Bonus and maternity pay

Don’t go on maternity leave at bonus time. In Lewen v Dender [2000], the ECJ said that where a bonus is a reward for work done, the employer may reduce it proportionately for an employee’s absence on maternity leave, but (proving that the ECJ is reality detached) if it is to encourage

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll