header-logo header-logo

20 October 2011 / Roderick Ramage
Issue: 7486 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

Law in 101 words

Snippets from The Reduced Law Dictionary, by Roderick Ramage

Minors’ contracts

A person under age 18 is a minor: Family Law Reform Act 1969 ss 1, 9. Contracts with minors will be one of the following:
 

  • Valid: contracts for necessaries and for education and training.
  • Void at common law: other contracts including trade.
  • Voidable by the minor: continuing contracts, eg tenancy or partnership agreements, avoided before or within a reasonable time of reaching full age.
  • Enforceable but not against the minor: on reaching full age a minor may sue but not be sued on a contract made while a minor, even if there is new consideration or ratification.

Wet ink signatures

A signature page subsequently attached to documents, is not a valid execution of a document for the purposes of s1(3) of the Law of Property Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989: R (on the application of Mercury Tax Group) v HM Revenue and Customs Comrs (2008). If the whole document is sent by e-mail with a separate signature page, only that page

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll