header-logo header-logo

01 March 2018
Issue: 7783 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Law in 101 words

nlj_7783_backpage

Snippets from The Reduced Law Dictionary, by Roderick Ramage

Contracts by email

If the requirements for offer and acceptance, consideration and intention to create legal relations are satisfied, they may be communicated in any form. Email does not ‘magic away’ the normal rules of contract. In Pretty Pictures v Quixote Films [2003] the parties had conducted a lengthy negotiation by email, concluding with an email from one setting out the terms and a reply from the other approving them and saying that a written contract would be sent. Held: there was no contract because it was clear that the parties intended that there would be no contract until a deal memo was signed.

In connection with

Forsters, solicitors, advised Irtysh Petroleum plc on the purchase of a Russian company and started proceedings for unpaid fees, which were settled by an agreement covering ‘all claims that the parties had or could have had against each other’, and the definition of ‘claims’ ended with ‘arising out of or in connection with the action’. Irtysh discovered that the shares had not

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

London corporate and commercial team announces partner appointment

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Firm appoints new head of criminal litigation team

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll