header-logo header-logo

04 December 2020
Issue: 7914 / Categories: Legal News , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Public
printer mail-detail

Law Commission: reforming misconduct in public office

The Law Commission has laid recommendations in parliament to reform the law governing politicians and public officials’ misconduct in public office

The Commission, which advises the government on law reform, called this week for the common law offence of misconduct in public office to be replaced with two statutory offences. It claims the offence is outdated and unclear, and would like to clarify and modernise the law, targeting the most serious misconduct.

It recommends creating an offence of corruption in public office, for example, a police officer who misuses their position to take sexual advantage of a vulnerable victim, and an offence of breach of duty in public office, for example, where a death in prison occurs due to the reckless failure of a prison officer to prevent it.

There would be a defence if the conduct was in the public interest. For clarity, there would be a list of positions that constitute ‘public office’.

The Commission also recommends making the consent of the Director of Public Prosecutions a requirement, to prevent vexatious private prosecutions.

The proposed punishment for the offence would be 10-14 years’ imprisonment.

More than 80 prosecutions for misconduct have been brought each year since 2006. Recent high-profile examples include a private prosecution brought against Prime Minister Boris Johnson regarding alleged misconduct during the Brexit campaign. A judge at Westminster Magistrates’ Court issued a summons against the Prime Minister but the High Court later dismissed the case.

The PM was also formally referred to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC), over allegations he committed the offence while Mayor of London due to an alleged conflict of interest regarding benefits provided to US businesswoman Jennifer Arcuri. However, the IOPC decided not to investigate the allegations.

Professor Penney Lewis, Criminal Law Commissioner, said: ‘The offence of misconduct in public office has been rightly criticised for being outdated, vague, and open to misuse.

‘Our recommendations will clarify and modernise the law, while ensuring that public office holders are held to account for serious breaches of the trust that the public places in them.’

Download a summary of the report.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll