header-logo header-logo

Law Commission: reforming misconduct in public office

04 December 2020
Issue: 7914 / Categories: Legal News , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Public
printer mail-detail
The Law Commission has laid recommendations in parliament to reform the law governing politicians and public officials’ misconduct in public office

The Commission, which advises the government on law reform, called this week for the common law offence of misconduct in public office to be replaced with two statutory offences. It claims the offence is outdated and unclear, and would like to clarify and modernise the law, targeting the most serious misconduct.

It recommends creating an offence of corruption in public office, for example, a police officer who misuses their position to take sexual advantage of a vulnerable victim, and an offence of breach of duty in public office, for example, where a death in prison occurs due to the reckless failure of a prison officer to prevent it.

There would be a defence if the conduct was in the public interest. For clarity, there would be a list of positions that constitute ‘public office’.

The Commission also recommends making the consent of the Director of Public Prosecutions a requirement, to prevent vexatious private prosecutions.

The proposed punishment for the offence would be 10-14 years’ imprisonment.

More than 80 prosecutions for misconduct have been brought each year since 2006. Recent high-profile examples include a private prosecution brought against Prime Minister Boris Johnson regarding alleged misconduct during the Brexit campaign. A judge at Westminster Magistrates’ Court issued a summons against the Prime Minister but the High Court later dismissed the case.

The PM was also formally referred to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC), over allegations he committed the offence while Mayor of London due to an alleged conflict of interest regarding benefits provided to US businesswoman Jennifer Arcuri. However, the IOPC decided not to investigate the allegations.

Professor Penney Lewis, Criminal Law Commissioner, said: ‘The offence of misconduct in public office has been rightly criticised for being outdated, vague, and open to misuse.

‘Our recommendations will clarify and modernise the law, while ensuring that public office holders are held to account for serious breaches of the trust that the public places in them.’

Download a summary of the report.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll