header-logo header-logo

Law Commission to review pre-nups

19 June 2008
Issue: 7326 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Legal news

The enforceability of pre- and post-nuptial agreements between spouses and civil partners is to be examined by the Law Commission in a new review.

Marital property agreements are not currently enforceable in the UK if spouses divorce or a civil partnership is dissolved, although a court may consider them in determining what ancillary relief is appropriate.

A Law Commission spokesperson says there is a view that the fact that pre-nuptial agreements are not currently binding may deter some from marrying or entering into civil partnerships.

Resolution wants pre-marital agreements made binding unless upholding an agreement would cause significant injustice.

A spokesperson says: “Pre-marital agreements are not currently enforceable. They are sometimes upheld by the courts but the law falls short of providing the level of certainty that couples want when they make an agreement.”

Resolution concedes that there is a risk of satellite litigation flowing to define “significant injustice”, but concludes that this is “a small price to pay for the certainty of pre-marital agreements”.

The Commission’s review will be begin next year with a draft Bill expected in 2012. In the meantime, says Charles Russell partner, Sarah Higgins, pre-nuptial agreements will continue to be dealt with by the courts.

“This means that there will still be uncertainty when advising clients on marital breakdown and the potential for expensive litigation,” she says.

Issue: 7326 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Lawyers can no longer afford to ignore the metaverse, says Jacqueline Watts of Allin1 Advisory in this week's NLJ. Far from being a passing tech fad, virtual platforms like Roblox host thriving economies and social interactions, raising real legal issues
back-to-top-scroll