header-logo header-logo

Law Commission to review pre-nups

19 June 2008
Issue: 7326 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Legal news

The enforceability of pre- and post-nuptial agreements between spouses and civil partners is to be examined by the Law Commission in a new review.

Marital property agreements are not currently enforceable in the UK if spouses divorce or a civil partnership is dissolved, although a court may consider them in determining what ancillary relief is appropriate.

A Law Commission spokesperson says there is a view that the fact that pre-nuptial agreements are not currently binding may deter some from marrying or entering into civil partnerships.

Resolution wants pre-marital agreements made binding unless upholding an agreement would cause significant injustice.

A spokesperson says: “Pre-marital agreements are not currently enforceable. They are sometimes upheld by the courts but the law falls short of providing the level of certainty that couples want when they make an agreement.”

Resolution concedes that there is a risk of satellite litigation flowing to define “significant injustice”, but concludes that this is “a small price to pay for the certainty of pre-marital agreements”.

The Commission’s review will be begin next year with a draft Bill expected in 2012. In the meantime, says Charles Russell partner, Sarah Higgins, pre-nuptial agreements will continue to be dealt with by the courts.

“This means that there will still be uncertainty when advising clients on marital breakdown and the potential for expensive litigation,” she says.

Issue: 7326 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll