header-logo header-logo

19 June 2008
Issue: 7326 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Law Commission to review pre-nups

Legal news

The enforceability of pre- and post-nuptial agreements between spouses and civil partners is to be examined by the Law Commission in a new review.

Marital property agreements are not currently enforceable in the UK if spouses divorce or a civil partnership is dissolved, although a court may consider them in determining what ancillary relief is appropriate.

A Law Commission spokesperson says there is a view that the fact that pre-nuptial agreements are not currently binding may deter some from marrying or entering into civil partnerships.

Resolution wants pre-marital agreements made binding unless upholding an agreement would cause significant injustice.

A spokesperson says: “Pre-marital agreements are not currently enforceable. They are sometimes upheld by the courts but the law falls short of providing the level of certainty that couples want when they make an agreement.”

Resolution concedes that there is a risk of satellite litigation flowing to define “significant injustice”, but concludes that this is “a small price to pay for the certainty of pre-marital agreements”.

The Commission’s review will be begin next year with a draft Bill expected in 2012. In the meantime, says Charles Russell partner, Sarah Higgins, pre-nuptial agreements will continue to be dealt with by the courts.

“This means that there will still be uncertainty when advising clients on marital breakdown and the potential for expensive litigation,” she says.

Issue: 7326 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll