header-logo header-logo

19 June 2008
Issue: 7326 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Law Commission to review pre-nups

Legal news

The enforceability of pre- and post-nuptial agreements between spouses and civil partners is to be examined by the Law Commission in a new review.

Marital property agreements are not currently enforceable in the UK if spouses divorce or a civil partnership is dissolved, although a court may consider them in determining what ancillary relief is appropriate.

A Law Commission spokesperson says there is a view that the fact that pre-nuptial agreements are not currently binding may deter some from marrying or entering into civil partnerships.

Resolution wants pre-marital agreements made binding unless upholding an agreement would cause significant injustice.

A spokesperson says: “Pre-marital agreements are not currently enforceable. They are sometimes upheld by the courts but the law falls short of providing the level of certainty that couples want when they make an agreement.”

Resolution concedes that there is a risk of satellite litigation flowing to define “significant injustice”, but concludes that this is “a small price to pay for the certainty of pre-marital agreements”.

The Commission’s review will be begin next year with a draft Bill expected in 2012. In the meantime, says Charles Russell partner, Sarah Higgins, pre-nuptial agreements will continue to be dealt with by the courts.

“This means that there will still be uncertainty when advising clients on marital breakdown and the potential for expensive litigation,” she says.

Issue: 7326 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll