header-logo header-logo

Law Commissioners to review criminal appeals process

02 August 2023
Issue: 8036 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail
An overhaul of the criminal appeals process is on the cards, after the Law Commission launched a major review into potential reform.

The review follows growing concern in recent years about the piecemeal development of the law governing criminal appeals, with the Justice Select Committee and the Westminster Commission on Miscarriages of Justice among those calling for reform. The commissioners will review the tests used to grant an appeal and whether court resources are being used effectively.

Specifically, the commissioners are seeking views on: the need to reform the appeals process in magistrates’ courts, whether the Court of Appeal has adequate and appropriate powers to hear appeals, and whether the tests used to grant an appeal make it too difficult to correct miscarriages of justice.

They will look into the Attorney General’s powers to refer cases to the Court of Appeal where the sentence is ‘unduly lenient’ or a legal error has been made. The commissioners are also seeking views on whether appeals are hampered by laws governing retention and disclosure of evidence and access to records of proceedings.

Professor Penney Lewis, criminal law commissioner, said: ‘We will consider proposals for reform that will ensure the appeals process provides a robust safeguard against wrongful convictions and instils confidence in the criminal justice system. 

‘We therefore welcome a wide range of responses to our issues paper to help us identify if there are areas of the law that are not working.’

A spokesperson for the Criminal Appeals Lawyers Association, said: ‘This signifies an important opportunity to bring about a more just and equitable post-conviction legal landscape.

‘We shall work with the Law Commission to strengthen the appeals system so that miscarriages of justice can be properly identified and rectified.’

More information is available at: www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/criminal-appeals. Views should be submitted by 31 October 2023.

Issue: 8036 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll