header-logo header-logo

02 August 2023
Issue: 8036 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Law Commissioners to review criminal appeals process

An overhaul of the criminal appeals process is on the cards, after the Law Commission launched a major review into potential reform.

The review follows growing concern in recent years about the piecemeal development of the law governing criminal appeals, with the Justice Select Committee and the Westminster Commission on Miscarriages of Justice among those calling for reform. The commissioners will review the tests used to grant an appeal and whether court resources are being used effectively.

Specifically, the commissioners are seeking views on: the need to reform the appeals process in magistrates’ courts, whether the Court of Appeal has adequate and appropriate powers to hear appeals, and whether the tests used to grant an appeal make it too difficult to correct miscarriages of justice.

They will look into the Attorney General’s powers to refer cases to the Court of Appeal where the sentence is ‘unduly lenient’ or a legal error has been made. The commissioners are also seeking views on whether appeals are hampered by laws governing retention and disclosure of evidence and access to records of proceedings.

Professor Penney Lewis, criminal law commissioner, said: ‘We will consider proposals for reform that will ensure the appeals process provides a robust safeguard against wrongful convictions and instils confidence in the criminal justice system. 

‘We therefore welcome a wide range of responses to our issues paper to help us identify if there are areas of the law that are not working.’

A spokesperson for the Criminal Appeals Lawyers Association, said: ‘This signifies an important opportunity to bring about a more just and equitable post-conviction legal landscape.

‘We shall work with the Law Commission to strengthen the appeals system so that miscarriages of justice can be properly identified and rectified.’

More information is available at: www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/criminal-appeals. Views should be submitted by 31 October 2023.

Issue: 8036 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll