header-logo header-logo

30 October 2008
Issue: 7343 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law

Chagger v Abbey National plc [2008] All ER (D) 157 (Oct)

(i) Claimants who formulate their claim on the basis of “colour discrimination” will inevitably be complaining of discrimination on the ground of race and ethnic origin, and two factors which explicitly attract the operation of s 54A of the Race Relations Act 1976.

(ii) In assessing compensation in a discrimination case, it is relevant to take into account the chance that the respondent might have caused the same damage lawfully if he had not done so on discriminatory grounds.

(iii) The risk that future potential employers may decline to employ the claimant because of the claim which he has brought is not a matter which can be reflected in his compensation: the natural scope of liability for a discriminatory dismissal does not extend beyond the injury inherent in the loss of the employment in question.

Issue: 7343 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sackers—Zak Ullah

Sackers—Zak Ullah

Sackers welcomes new associate

Christy Davies—Birmingham Law Society

Christy Davies—Birmingham Law Society

Ward Hadaway lawyer joins Birmingham Law Society Council

Ellisons—Stephanie Westwood & Anisa Khan

Ellisons—Stephanie Westwood & Anisa Khan

Ellisons expands Chelmsford commercial litigation team with two appointments

NEWS
Businesses incorporating open-source software into commercial products could face obligations to disclose valuable source code, with AI-assisted development making licensing risks harder to track
Careless client checks do not automatically make a solicitor dishonest, but deliberately avoiding confirmation of suspected wrongdoing can cross the line
Construction workers injured in comparable accidents can face sharply different routes to compensation on opposite sides of the Atlantic
Victims of undue influence may have more options than simply unwinding a tainted transaction, with courts able to order profits accounts, compensation and, exceptionally, severance
Disabled people could lose vital safeguards following the Supreme Court’s reversal of the Cheshire West test for deprivation of liberty, two barristers warn
back-to-top-scroll