header-logo header-logo

Criminal Evidence

03 January 2008 / Peter Hungerford-welch
Issue: 7302 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Lynch [2007] All ER (D) 346 (Nov)

This case concerned the admissibility of a statement made by a witness during an identification procedure held pursuant to PACE Code D. 

 

HELD - Section 67 of Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE 1984) does not render admissible something which is hearsay evidence, albeit evidence obtained during a process properly conducted under the Codes of Practice. The Codes of Practice do not alter the rules on admissibility of evidence. Moreover, the Criminal Justice Act 2003, s 114(1)(a) is not authority for the proposition that anything said by a witness in an identification parade is admissible merely because it operated in accordance with Code D.  However, some statements might be so bound up so as to form part of the exception to the hearsay rule; a statement accompanying a relevant act might therefore be admissible. Moreover, the judge was also entitled to conclude that the statement was admissible in the interests of justice pursuant to s 114(1)(d).

Issue: 7302 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll