header-logo header-logo

Employment Law

15 May 2008
Issue: 7321 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Enfield Technical Services Ltd v Payne; Grace v B F Components Ltd

 

A contract of employment may be unlawfully performed if there are misrepresentations, express or implied, as to the facts, eg when what is in fact taxable salary is claimed to be non-taxable expenses. That is, however, distinguishable from an error of categorisation unaccompanied by such false representations.

 

While a mis-categorisation may amount to misrepresentation and bad faith which would deprive the employee of the right subsequently to claim the benefits of employment, a genuine claim to self-employment, unaccompanied by false representations as to the

work being done or the basis on which payment is being made, does not necessarily amount to unlawful performance of a contract of employment (Lord Justice Pill at 28 and 29).

 

Issue: 7321 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll