header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
29 May 2008 / Peter Hungerford-welch
Issue: 7323 / Categories: Case law , Tribunals , Legal services , Law digest , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

O’Toole v Cortest Ltd [2008] All ER (D) 220 (May)

 

The Employment Appeal Tribunal cited with approval guidance from what was the Department of Trade and Industry, to the effect that the right to take a reasonable amount of time off for the care of dependants, under s 57A(1)(d) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, is to enable the employee to deal with certain unexpected events on emergencies and to make any necessary longer term arrangements. The legislation does not specify the amount of time off which is reasonable because that will vary in accordance with the emergency, but in most cases one or two days should be sufficient to deal with the problem.

 

Issue: 7323 / Categories: Case law , Tribunals , Legal services , Law digest , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys further bolsters Private Equity expertise with the appointment of James Paterson

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons strengthens Rural Affairs team with senior appointment

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley adds insurance mergers and acquisitions partner to London office

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Consultant firms face tougher scrutiny
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
NLJ this week: AI grievances demand human judgement
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
NLJ this week: Dishonesty, promotions & procedural headaches
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
NLJ this week: Remote hearings reshape the courtroom
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
NLJ this week: Can landlords force the door?
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll