header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
29 May 2008 / Peter Hungerford-welch
Issue: 7323 / Categories: Case law , Tribunals , Legal services , Law digest , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

O’Toole v Cortest Ltd [2008] All ER (D) 220 (May)

 

The Employment Appeal Tribunal cited with approval guidance from what was the Department of Trade and Industry, to the effect that the right to take a reasonable amount of time off for the care of dependants, under s 57A(1)(d) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, is to enable the employee to deal with certain unexpected events on emergencies and to make any necessary longer term arrangements. The legislation does not specify the amount of time off which is reasonable because that will vary in accordance with the emergency, but in most cases one or two days should be sufficient to deal with the problem.

 

Issue: 7323 / Categories: Case law , Tribunals , Legal services , Law digest , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Speechlive LogoClick to know more
Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
Read All
Law Society RFC Festival of Sport 2026 ‘Wrap-Up’
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
NLJ this week: Part-time protection widens
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
NLJ this week: Britain’s unpaid account
Britain’s new acknowledgement that Israel’s occupation is unlawful, and accompanying settlement-goods ban and sanctions, is significant but overdue, argue Danny Friedman KC and Victor Kattan in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: Rules, risks & red tape
New planning fee rises, wider trade union access rights and a service-by-email trap feature in Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way
NLJ this week: When bots libel
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll