header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
14 May 2020
Issue: 7886 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 15 May 2020

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Company

Robinson v H G Robinson & Sons Ltd and others [2020] EWHC 1 (Ch), [2020] All ER (D) 40 (May)

The petitioner’s petition for winding up of the family company would be struck out. The Chancery Division held that the petitioner had acted unreasonably in seeking to wind up the company instead of pursuing: (i) the offer from the respondent family members to buy his shares at a fair value; and/or (ii) a claim under s 994 of the Companies Act 2006. Having found that a winding up order would not be made, it was appropriate for the court to exercise its discretion to strike out the petition.

Customs & excise

Logfret (UK) Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2020] EWCA Civ 569, [2020] All ER (D) 35 (May)

The Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) had been correct to find that the appellant taxpayer, which was the guarantor for duty in respect of goods which were moved under

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Renters’ Rights revolution begins—brace for tribunal chaos

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

NLJ this week: Civil procedure gets a spring overhaul
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
NLJ this week: Why GP complaints are going nowhere
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
NLJ this week: Prenups meet a jurisdictional brick wall
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
NLJ this week: Has Rylands v Fletcher come back from the dead?
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll