header-logo header-logo

12 June 2008
Issue: 7325 / Categories: Case law , Public , Law digest
printer mail-detail

CRIMINAL LITIGATION

Redknapp v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [2008] EWHC 1177 (Admin) [2008] All ER (D) 319 (May)

The obtaining of a search warrant under s 8 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) is never to be treated as a formality. All the material necessary to justify the grant of a warrant should be contained in the information provided on the application form. If the magistrate (or judge in the case of an application under s 9), requires any further information in order to satisfy himself that the warrant is justified, a note should be made of the additional information so that there is a proper record of the full basis upon which the warrant was granted.

If the application for the warrant does not identify which of the conditions in s 8(3) is being relied on, the issue of the warrant will be unlawful. While PACE distinguishes between a “specific premises warrant” and an “all premises warrant”, a single warrant may include both types provided that the relevant information is given to the magistrate. For the execution of the warrant to be lawful under s 16(5), the householder must be satisfied not only that there is a warrant in existence, but that it refers to his address.

Issue: 7325 / Categories: Case law , Public , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Payne Hicks Beach—Flora Hussey

Payne Hicks Beach—Flora Hussey

Private client department announces partner hire

Blake Morgan—Daniela Smith & Lee Fisher

Blake Morgan—Daniela Smith & Lee Fisher

Firm appoints first joint heads of Wales office

Ogier—Heidi Sandy & Farrah Sbaiti

Ogier—Heidi Sandy & Farrah Sbaiti

Global dispute resolution team promotes two partners in Guernsey and Cayman Islands

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll