header-logo header-logo

12 June 2008
Issue: 7325 / Categories: Case law , Public , Law digest
printer mail-detail

CRIMINAL LITIGATION

Redknapp v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [2008] EWHC 1177 (Admin) [2008] All ER (D) 319 (May)

The obtaining of a search warrant under s 8 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) is never to be treated as a formality. All the material necessary to justify the grant of a warrant should be contained in the information provided on the application form. If the magistrate (or judge in the case of an application under s 9), requires any further information in order to satisfy himself that the warrant is justified, a note should be made of the additional information so that there is a proper record of the full basis upon which the warrant was granted.

If the application for the warrant does not identify which of the conditions in s 8(3) is being relied on, the issue of the warrant will be unlawful. While PACE distinguishes between a “specific premises warrant” and an “all premises warrant”, a single warrant may include both types provided that the relevant information is given to the magistrate. For the execution of the warrant to be lawful under s 16(5), the householder must be satisfied not only that there is a warrant in existence, but that it refers to his address.

Issue: 7325 / Categories: Case law , Public , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll