header-logo header-logo

06 August 2009
Issue: 7381 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Employment law

Shaw v Remploy Ltd [2009] All ER (D) 294 (Jul)

Regulation 15 of the Employment Act 2002 (Dispute Resolution) Regulations 2004 (SI 2004/752) encouraged grievance procedures to happen, but it was of utility only once.

It did nothing more than provide an extension of time from three to six months in an unfair dismissal case.

It did not depend upon there being a procedure in place, but only upon the reasonable belief in the mind of the employee.

It was limited to a moment in time, namely, the time the primary limitation period expired. If the claimant had that reasonable belief, she would get an extension of time in which to bring a claim.

It was plainly envisaged that three months was sufficient for any internal procedure to be exhausted.
 

Issue: 7381 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll