header-logo header-logo

17 January 2008
Issue: 7304 / Categories: Case law , Public , Profession , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Education

R (Siborurema) v Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education [2007] EWCA Civ 1365, [2007] All ER (D) 329 (Dec)

 

The Office of the Independent Adjudicator (OIA) for Higher Education is amenable to judicial review. Lord Justice Pill (at paras 53 and 54) said that the OIA is able, when deciding whether or not particular complaints are justified, to exercise a discretion in determining how to approach the particular complaint. It is entitled to operate on the basis that different complaints may require different approaches.

 

In assessing whether a complaint has been approached in a lawful manner, the court will have regard to the expertise of the OIA, which in turn should have regard to the expertise of the Higher Education Institution (HEI) in question.

 

The OIA is entitled in most cases, if it sees fit, to take the HEI’s regulations and procedures as a starting point and to consider, when assessing a complaint, whether they have been complied with. The OIA is empowered to comment upon the reasonableness of those regulations and procedures and to conduct its own investigation into the facts underlying the complaint.

 

However, the OIA is not under a general obligation to re-hear the merits of the case made to the HEI, although there may be cases in which a decision as to whether a complaint is justified requires that course to be taken.

Issue: 7304 / Categories: Case law , Public , Profession , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll