header-logo header-logo

10 September 2009
Issue: 7384 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Education

TM v London Borough of Hounslow [2009] EWCA Civ 859, [2009] All ER (D) 17 (Sep)

It was insufficient for a local education authority simply to ask whether a particular school could meet a child’s statement of special education needs and then, if it found the answer to that question to be “yes”, to treat the effect of s 319 of the Education Act 1996 as requiring that the school be named.

The question which the authority had to address was whether it could be satisfied that it would be inappropriate for the special education provisions of the particular child to be made in school or not.

In answering that question, it was not enough to ask whether the school “can” meet the statement of needs. The authority had to take into account all the circumstances of the case in hand, including the parents’ wishes.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll