header-logo header-logo

15 October 2009
Issue: 7389 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Immigration

R (on the application of Anam) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWHC 2496 (Admin), [2009] All ER (D) 127 (Oct)

The case involved a challenge to a mentally ill Bangladeshi national’s detention pending deportation, with reference to the secretary of state’s policy contained in ch 55 of the Enforcement Instructions Guidance, entitled “Detention and Temporary Release”, not to detain mentally ill persons pending deportation, save in “very exceptional circumstances”.

The court ruled that although a person’s mental illness meant a strong presumption in favour of release would operate, there were other factors which had to go into the balance in a decision to detain.

The phrase “very exceptional circumstances” referred to at para 55.10 had to be construed in the context of the policy, namely that it was a policy which provided guidance for the detention of all those liable to removal, not merely foreign national prisoners.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll