header-logo header-logo

15 October 2009
Issue: 7389 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Town & country planning

The River Club v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another [2009] All ER (D) 66 (Oct)

The words “and any other harm” in para 3.2 of PPG2 were not to be restricted to harm affecting the green belt only.

Rather, they included both harm which was by definition “inappropriate harm” and some other harm.

That would enable a decision-maker to measure clearly the level of “harm” which might be caused to the green belt by a particular development against the benefits of the same, for the purposes of concluding whether “very special circumstances” existed to enable a grant of planning permission.

 

 

 

 

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll