header-logo header-logo

12 March 2009
Issue: 7360 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Family law

T (a child) (care order) [2009] EWCA Civ 121, [2009] All ER (D) 47 (Mar)

The making of a care order even though children remained living at home might be justified where the local authority needs the power not only to remove the children instantly but also to plan for their long-term placement outside the family without any prior judicial sanction, or where it is necessary for the local authority to share parental responsibility with the parents.

It would be wrong to impose an order simply to encourage a local authority to perform its statutory duty towards children in need. Moreover, cogent and strong reasons are required to force upon a local authority a more draconian order than that for which it has asked.

Issue: 7360 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll